Search for: "Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation" Results 121 - 140 of 148
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Jun 2010, 1:58 pm by Matthew Kadushin
Swiss pharmaceutical firm Novartis was found guilty of New York sexual harassment and discrimination last Monday by a jury and ordered to pay out $3.3 million to a dozen women who headed up a class action suit. [read post]
2 Jun 2010, 8:50 am
Department of Energy 82 Teach for America 83 Abbott 84 AT&T 85 MGM Mirage 86 Mayo Clinic 87 Lockheed Martin Corporation 88 Merck 89 Limited Brands 90 Hyatt Hotels and Resorts 91 Colgate-Palmolive Company 92 Dell Inc. 93 Lilly 94 Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation 95 The Vanguard Group 96 Oracle 97 Vestas 98 Wal-Mart Stores Inc. 99 Honda Companies 100 [read post]
5 May 2010, 5:14 pm by FDABlog HPM
Martin – FDA just released the Warning Letter it issued to Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation (“Novartis”) in April regarding two purportedly unbranded websites, www.gistalliance.com and www.cmlalliance.com (the “alliance websites”), which included disease-state information and clinical data about gastrointestinal stromal tumors (“GIST”) and chronic myeloid leukemia (“CML”).  [read post]
4 May 2010, 10:29 pm by Ben Vernia
According to DOJ’s press release: Novartis Vaccines & Diagnostics Inc. and Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation have agreed to pay $72.5 million to resolve civil False Claims Act allegations arising from the marketing of the cystic fibrosis drug TOBI, the Justice Department announced today. [read post]
2 Mar 2010, 6:28 am by John J. Cord
Up until now, online social networking has been treated mostly as a plaything for some pharmaceutical manufacturers. [read post]
18 Dec 2009, 9:59 am by Karen E. Keller
(patent infringement) 12/10: Seattle Children's Hospital, Novartis AG, Novartis Vaccines and Diagnostics, Inc. and Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation v. [read post]
19 Oct 2009, 1:24 am
The ruling wipes out verdicts of $33 million against Novartis, $81 million against GlaxoSmithKline, and $215 million (reduced post-trial to $160 million) against AstraZeneca. [read post]
30 Aug 2009, 10:00 pm
Bivins (a citizen of Texas) sued Novartis Pharmaceuticals (a Delaware corporation with its principal place of business in New Jersey), Novartis Pharma GmbH (a German corporation), and Novartis AG (a Swiss corporation) in New Jersey state court. [read post]
2 Feb 2009, 9:51 am
This January 2008 press release from KV Pharmaceutical, the parent company of ETHEX, includes a list of the more than 60 generic drugs being recalled by ETHEX. [read post]
22 Jan 2009, 2:06 am
As we reported yesterday, the California Supreme Court denied the petitions for review in Wyeth v. [read post]
15 Oct 2008, 3:02 pm
For example, the pharmaceutical industry intensified its efforts to influence the FDA in the months leading up to the physician labeling rule's release on January 24, 2006. [read post]
15 Oct 2008, 8:38 am
"In effect the Bush administration made the safety of Americans secondary to corporate profits. [read post]
15 Aug 2008, 12:52 pm
The Editorial Board of SCRIPTed - A Journal of Law, Technology & Society is pleased to present its 18th issue, which addresses issues ranging from challenges in medical research governance in Korea, to pharmaceutical litigation (an assessment of the Novartis case in India), to data-protection of administrative records, to privacy in the age of sophisticated location-based technologies, to governance of the mobile communication sector in Korea and US, to a follow-up on our… [read post]
11 Feb 2008, 9:20 am
February 2008 Australian Report Links Liver Failure And Hepatitis To Popular Novartis Drug (Posted by Tom Lamb at DrugInjuryWatch.com) A February 4, 2008 article, "Anti-fungal tablet linked to liver deaths", published by Australia's Herald Sun newspaper, brought to our attention the fact that Australian drug regulators have issued a warning about serious liver reactions after taking a popular prescription drug used to treat fungal infections, Lamisil (terbinafine),… [read post]
27 Dec 2007, 7:09 am
Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corp., 2007 WL 1521138 (D.N.J. [read post]
25 Nov 2007, 11:04 am
And the New Jersey defendants did not appear to be sham: They were Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation and Novartis Corporation, which presumably played a significant role in manufacturing or selling the drug that allegedy killed the plaintiffs' child.And the plaintiffs seemingly made good faith efforts to serve the complaint on Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation. [read post]