Search for: "Nunez v. State"
Results 1 - 20
of 153
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Mar 2021, 7:12 am
Criminal procedure — Cross-examination by defense — Consistency with investigative protocols A jury of the Circuit Court for Montgomery County convicted Danilo Enriquez Nunez of second-degree rape and third-degree sexual offense. [read post]
28 May 2019, 12:48 pm
Other than the minor surprise I now experience when any motion to compel arbitration is denied, such agreements having achieved a status as super-contracts with super powers, the decision in Nunez v. [read post]
21 Sep 2021, 2:04 am
The United States Supreme Court may decide this in the case of City of Hayward v. [read post]
2 Sep 2013, 5:18 am
Nunez, supra (citing U.S. v. [read post]
29 May 2021, 8:33 am
Kaul won in State v. [read post]
28 Dec 2012, 4:01 am
Contempt proceeding used to enforce a court order directing reinstatement Angel Nunez v City of New York, 43 AD3d 808 Angel Nunez obtained a court order directing his reinstatement to his former position, or a comparable position, with the New York City Department of Sanitation, together with back pay and benefits [City of New York v New York State Div. of Human Rights, 229 AD2d 307, leave to appeal denied, 89 NY2d 801]. [read post]
1 Jul 2015, 2:51 pm
”Contrary to the content and tone of Nunez’s letter, the probation report states Nunez lied when first contacted by police, was “never cooperative,” and after his arrest and release sent a text message to a codefendant stating, 'Gangster rap made us do it lol.'"Dude. [read post]
1 Oct 2007, 10:00 am
In Cadle Co. v. [read post]
2 May 2014, 6:42 am
The Facts in Commonwealth v. [read post]
27 Jul 2013, 9:07 am
Recently, the Florida Supreme Court issued a decision in Nunez v. [read post]
30 Jun 2007, 7:20 am
Alison V. [read post]
22 Jun 2022, 8:14 pm
Nunez v. [read post]
19 Dec 2007, 5:48 am
Nunez is one of fifteen defendants charged in a wide-ranging mortgage fraud scheme in United States v. [read post]
2 Aug 2009, 11:41 pm
In the case of State v. [read post]
10 Feb 2010, 3:17 pm
Given what the doctrine says -- both the categorical approach as well as the expansive state law doctrine of indecent exposure -- why didn't the government introduce evidence that satisfied the modified approach and proved that Nunez was convicted (as I'm sure he was) of a true moral turpitude offense rather than due to his appearance on "Boys Gone Wild" or on one side of a glory hole?! [read post]
17 Jul 2011, 3:01 pm
If I knew how to put a black box around a posting to signify a sad, dark day for non-citizens, I would do it for this posting as I write about a new decision, Nunez Reyes v. [read post]
31 Jul 2009, 6:57 am
The Court ruled in State v. [read post]
28 Dec 2008, 6:25 am
State v. [read post]
14 Jul 2011, 3:44 pm
En Banc Decision: Nunez-Reyes v. [read post]
10 Dec 2023, 1:51 pm
Acosta, 725 F.3d 868, 874 (8th Cir. 2013) (standard of review); see also Nunez-Escudero v. [read post]
