Search for: "O'BRIEN v. United States" Results 41 - 60 of 102
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Feb 2010, 10:05 am by Eugene Volokh
Accordingly, the respondent’s determination was not arbitrary or capricious and should not be disturbed (see Matter of O’Brien v Keegan, 87 NY2d 436, 439; Matter of Sarro v Smith, 8 AD3d at 395). [read post]
16 Mar 2011, 8:55 am by Eugene Volokh
I don’t agree with all the analysis (for instance, the O’Brien analysis strikes me as incorrect), but the bottom line seems right, under the Court’s decision in United States v. [read post]
16 Dec 2010, 1:59 am
Put another way, how much illness in the United States is caused by foodborne pathogens?   [read post]
5 Jul 2011, 4:19 pm by NL
A delay of three months in enforcing an injunction in similar circumstances on these grounds was ordered in South Cambridgeshire District Council v O'Brien [2008] EWCA Civ 1159. [read post]
5 Jul 2011, 4:19 pm by NL
A delay of three months in enforcing an injunction in similar circumstances on these grounds was ordered in South Cambridgeshire District Council v O'Brien [2008] EWCA Civ 1159. [read post]
22 Oct 2011, 5:49 am by Timothy P. Flynn
Oakland County Circuit Judge Colleen O'Brien is on the commission along with former Oakland County Bar Association President Judith Gracey.The problem presented to the Commission is how to provide effective assistance of counsel, as guaranteed under the United States and the Michigan Constitutions, for accused individuals that cannot afford to hire a lawyer.   [read post]
1 Nov 2011, 3:59 am by Timothy P. Flynn, Esq.
Oakland County Circuit Judge Colleen O'Brien is on the commission along with former Oakland County Bar Association President Judith Gracey.The problem presented to the Commission is how to provide effective assistance of counsel, as guaranteed under the United States and the Michigan Constitutions, for accused individuals that cannot afford to hire a lawyer.   [read post]
3 Jul 2012, 1:16 pm
The Defendants argued that this instruction was insufficient because the jury was required to find, beyond a reasonable doubt, that the defendants knew the gun they possessed had the characteristics of a machine gun, relying on United States v. [read post]
28 Mar 2012, 9:05 pm by admin
In 1968, the Supreme Court decided United States v. [read post]
14 Jun 2010, 1:32 pm by Erin Miller
Justice Stevens wrote a concurrence in this Term’s case, United States v. [read post]
21 Jun 2010, 9:38 am by Eugene Volokh
Humanitarian Law Project seems to reject this: United States v. [read post]
3 Dec 2012, 5:56 pm
 So if, in addition to the foregoing, the material support statute were construed to apply to all manner of non-expressive services (such as banking, transportation, etc.), then we would merely have a general law that happened to be applied to expressive acts--and so free speech doctrine pursuant to United States v. [read post]
24 May 2010, 7:48 pm by Erin Miller
Bill Mears of CNN reports on the decision in United States v. [read post]