Search for: "O'HARA v. State" Results 1 - 20 of 29
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Jul 2011, 2:22 am by Gilles Cuniberti
Readers interested in whether the decision of the state of New York to legalize gay marriage shows that a market for marriage law exists in the United States should see this post of Larry Ribstein over at Truth on the Market. [read post]
28 Mar 2011, 7:36 am by Jaclene D'Agostino
Generally, the following elements must be established to state a claim for this type of relief: (1) a confidential or fiduciary relation; (2) a promise; (3) a transfer in reliance thereon; and (4) unjust enrichment (see Sharp v Kosmalski, 40 NY2d 119, 121 [1976]).  [read post]
10 Sep 2010, 10:27 am by Brendan Kevenides
In 1995, the Illinois Appellate Court decided this issue in People v. [read post]
3 May 2010, 2:47 pm by Dwight Sullivan
There will probably never be a record of trial in the court-martial case of United States v. [read post]
11 Apr 2011, 10:59 am by Daniel E. Cummins
Judge Nealon noted that Erie's forum selection clause had been previously upheld as valid by the Pennsylvania Superior Court in the separate case of O'Hara v.  [read post]
28 Sep 2011, 12:21 pm by Robert Thomas (
As part of the Fall Meeting of the ABA's Section of State & Local Government Law in Tucson, on Thursday, September 22, I was on a panel discussing the Supreme Court's recent decision in Nevada Commission on Ethics v. [read post]
8 Jul 2010, 8:43 pm by Daniel E. Cummins
The Progressive forum selection clause required that any legal action brought against the carrier on behalf of an insured person must be brought in the state or federal court serving the county of residence of the insured (in this case, Monroe County).In pursuing the forum selection clause argument, Progressive relied primarily on the case of O’Hara v. [read post]