Search for: "OKLA. NATURAL GAS CO. v. STATE"
Results 1 - 20
of 30
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Sep 2009, 5:09 am
Okla. 2005); Morales v. [read post]
28 Sep 2009, 1:31 am
Okla. 2005); Morales v. [read post]
28 Sep 2009, 1:31 am
Okla. 2005); Morales v. [read post]
28 Sep 2009, 1:31 am
Okla. 2005); Morales v. [read post]
18 Sep 2017, 3:00 am
Mobil Oil Co., 243 P.3d 1 (Okla. 2010), the Oklahoma Supreme Court had concluded that Oklahoma law would govern class members’ fraud claims even though some members were citizens of other states. [read post]
11 Jan 2022, 1:55 am
In addition to the tax changes mentioned here, many states will see automatic adjustments to a range of tax rates, from inflation-indexing of gas taxes or income tax rates and brackets to formula-driven adjustments to unemployment insurance tax rates. [read post]
15 Apr 2011, 6:02 am
Fla. 1995) (same).GeorgiaThe Georgia consumer protection provides only for injunctive relief, Ga. [read post]
11 Nov 2014, 7:27 pm
Evans v. [read post]
16 Nov 2012, 1:50 pm
Okla. [read post]
6 May 2016, 12:30 pm
Sanchez, 997 S.W.2d 584, 592 (Tex. 1999); Hyundai Motor Co. v. [read post]
2 Aug 2020, 4:58 am
A-Best Products Co., 542 Pa. 124, 665 A.2d 1167 (1995); Conley v. [read post]
17 Mar 2011, 8:08 am
Co. v. [read post]
12 Jan 2012, 1:15 pm
Appx. 689, 693 (10th Cir. 2011) (Phelan principle “ is especially true when a federal court is asked to make a policy laden choice for the State of Utah”); Northern Natural Gas Co. v. [read post]
15 Aug 2011, 9:24 pm
Ford Motor Co. v. [read post]
17 Apr 2018, 11:29 am
Co. v. [read post]
14 May 2012, 8:24 am
” Today, the nature of the asbestos litigation has changed, but it when we examine Pennsylvania law and procedure, it is not surprising to see that Dr. [read post]
15 Jul 2010, 2:39 pm
A state court said no. [read post]
2 Dec 2011, 2:00 pm
Okla. [read post]
19 Mar 2022, 2:09 pm
The important divide between regulatory practice and the litigation of causal claims in civil actions arises from the theoretical nature of the risk assessment enterprise. [read post]
7 Feb 2008, 10:46 am
Id. at 230 (FDA "d[id] not include" Plaintiffs' claimed requirement); 230 (Plaintiffs' claim "at best a tenuous assertion and, at worst, an outright mischaracterization of the record"); 230 ("the record flatly contradicts plaintiffs' position"); 231 (describing "specious nature of plaintiffs' claim"); 231-32 (claims based upon "inapplicable" materials). [read post]
