Search for: "OREGON NATURAL RESOURCES COUNCIL V U.S. BUREAU OF LAND" Results 1 - 10 of 10
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Apr 2008, 10:56 pm
Bureau of Land Management, 03:06-CV-00527-LRH-RAM, 2008 U.S. [read post]
10 Jul 2013, 10:03 am by Abbott & Kindermann
 That alternative is backed by a diverse group that includes The Bay Institute, the Contra Costa Council, Defenders of Wildlife, Environmental Entrepreneurs, the Planning and Conservation League, the Natural Resources Defense Council, the San Diego County Water Authority, Alameda County Water District, Contra Costa Water District, East Bay Municipal Utility District, Otay Water District, the City of San Diego and the San Francisco Public Utilities Commission.… [read post]
10 May 2024, 6:45 am by Evangelina Cantu
BLM’s Draft Programmatic EIS for Utility-Scale Solar Energy Development On January 19, 2024, the Bureau of Land Management (BLM) published notice of the availability of its Draft Programmatic Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) for Utility-Scale Solar Energy Development and Associated Resource Management Plan Amendments. [read post]
15 Nov 2023, 4:41 pm by Reference Staff
Also includes articles on Native American law in the Supreme CourtBoldt Decision — United States v. [read post]
9 Apr 2012, 10:30 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
Bodine, Confederated Tribes of the Warm Springs Reservation of Oregon, interning at The White House Council on Environmental Quality (CEQ);   v  Travis G. [read post]
31 Oct 2009, 4:06 pm by admin
Paul, United States Magistrate Judge Jeanne Graham fined the company $100,000 and ordered it to make a $50,000 community service payment to the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources to benefit the Rice Creek Watershed. [read post]
12 Mar 2023, 9:31 am by Dave Maass
(I'm Not Your) Steppin' Stone to Transparency Award: Federal Bureau of Investigation The Redactions Don't Gitmo Surreal Award: The U.S. [read post]
13 Sep 2010, 8:43 am by Steven M. Taber
Circuit Court of Appeals ruled that the Bureau of Land Management violated two federal laws by failing to consider the environmental ramifications of the regulation changes. [read post]