Search for: "Oberlander v. Oberlander" Results 1 - 19 of 19
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Mar 2009, 3:08 pm
In People v Oberlander (2009 NY Slip Op 02020 [4th Dept 3/20/09]), the Fourth Department held that County Court abused its discretion in denying defendant's request for a brief continuance to present a witness who, according to defendant, would present critical testimony which, if credited would have negated an element of the crime charged. [read post]
3 Mar 2020, 4:10 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
The underlying history of Oberlander v Wolf  2020 NY Slip Op 50263(U) Decided on February 25, 2020 Supreme Court, Suffolk County St. [read post]
24 Oct 2009, 10:54 am
I offer this in an attempt to catch up:Court remands custody case for new hearingIn Anita (Handy) Oberlander v. [read post]
2 Feb 2009, 8:01 pm
Oberlander, and in "direct response" to the decision, Senate Majority Leader Malcolm A. [read post]
26 Jan 2017, 1:30 am by Thaddeus Mason Pope, JD, PhD
Jessie Hill Mental Health and Other Behavioral Health Services - John V. [read post]
6 Sep 2007, 1:38 am
Oberlander             Subscription Required SUFFOLK COUNTYTorts'Frye' Hearing Ordered to Determine if Plaintiffs May Submit Evidence Regarding MCSS at Trial O'Brien v. [read post]
13 Jul 2020, 4:51 am by Peter Mahler
Realty Associates LLC v Blumberg, 2020 NY Slip Op 32200(U) [Sup Ct NY County July 7, 2020]  The aptly named S.O.S. [read post]
3 Dec 2015, 12:44 pm by Kirk Jenkins
During its just-ended November term, the Illinois Supreme Court heard oral argument in Jones v. [read post]
19 Feb 2018, 9:55 pm by Rechtsanwalt Martin Steiger
Radio und Fernsehen SRF berichten hingegen durchaus kritisch über die schweizerische Regierung, und völlig unabhängig von ihr. [read post]
29 Jan 2018, 6:45 am by Rechtsanwalt Martin Steiger
Ich stellte deshalb Strafantrag gegen zwei «Fax-Spammer»: Strafbefehl: Verurteilung wegen mehrfachem unlauterem Wettbewerb Im ersten Fall wurde der Absender, ein Unternehmer in der Schweiz, mittels Strafbefehl durch die Staatsanwaltschaft See / Oberland im Kanton Zürich wegen mehrfachem unlauterem Wettbewerb verurteilt: Der Beschuldigte musste mit Verweis auf Art. 3 Abs. 1 lit. o und lit. u UWG eine Geldstrafe von 20 Tagessätzen à 80 Franken, das heisst… [read post]