Search for: "Ocasio v. United States" Results 21 - 40 of 58
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Sep 2020, 3:47 am by Hayleigh Bosher
Public.Resource.Org that dealt with eligibility of copyright protection, stating that the non-authoritative status of annotations indicated that the creation of the annotations would fall outside of legislative duties.And even more recently, she authored the long-awaited decision regarding the "Booking.com" service mark, in United States Patent and Trademark Office v. [read post]
24 Jan 2019, 6:01 pm by Sam Brunson
By United States Senate, Public DomainBy Sam Brunson It’s not even an election year, but the last couple weeks have been exciting for tax policy fans. [read post]
9 Jul 2019, 2:29 pm by Kent Scheidegger
United States that the defendant must be aware of the threatening nature of the communication, but that element seems easily satisfied in this case. [read post]
10 Aug 2018, 4:49 am by SHG
The challenge here was one of political ideology, conservative v. socialist. [read post]
1 Oct 2015, 7:13 am by Farrah Nagrampa
Sachs, in which the court will determine when an entity is an “agent” of a “foreign state” under the Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act, and Ocasio v. [read post]
7 Mar 2023, 5:31 am by Alistair Simmons
United States, where the Supreme Court referred to an “automatic” or “fully automatic” weapon under the National Firearms Act as one “that fires repeatedly with a single pull of the trigger. [read post]
29 Jul 2015, 10:15 am by Lyle Denniston
United States — proof needed to convict a public official for criminal extortion under the Hobbs Act DirecTV v. [read post]
23 May 2016, 1:17 pm
District Court for the District of Massachusetts 2013) (citing United States v. [read post]
11 May 2016, 3:24 am by Amy Howe
United States, concluding that “this result doesn’t represent some new watershed in white collar crime or dramatic expansion of federal criminal jurisdiction. [read post]
1 Dec 2022, 8:37 am by Eric Goldman
The court concludes: Whether it is wise for members of the United States Congress to block critical constituents from their social-media accounts is not for a court to say. [read post]
26 Feb 2015, 9:19 am by Maureen Johnston
United States, or (b) “preventing further [government] disclosure,” United States v. [read post]
3 Mar 2022, 10:10 am by Eugene Volokh
"While we believe strongly in the warm friendship and cultural exchange that has long existed between the artists and artistic institutions of Russia and the United States," Mr. [read post]
5 Apr 2019, 7:53 am by Scott Bomboy
Representative Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez said in a TV interview with MSNBC, “They had to amend the Constitution of the United States to make sure [Franklin] Roosevelt did not get reelected,” referring to the 22nd Amendment. [read post]