Search for: "Odell v. State" Results 1 - 20 of 31
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Sep 2020, 6:43 am by INFORRM
Balancing competing rights Irish defamation cases are increasingly replete with comments stating the need to balance the constitutional right to freedom of expression with the constitutional right to a good name. [read post]
10 Mar 2020, 4:36 am by INFORRM
On those aspects which reach the Court, there will be uniformity in the Member States. [read post]
21 Feb 2020, 7:37 am by Daily Record Staff
Criminal law — Sufficiency of the evidence — Robbery Appellants, Shawn McQueen and Jeremy Graves, were tried together, with a third defendant, in the Circuit Court for Prince George’s County with respect to several robberies that took place in early 2018. [read post]
19 Dec 2019, 4:11 pm by INFORRM
And Article 24 required Member States for provide for sanctions for breach of implementing legislation. [read post]
18 Dec 2019, 4:08 pm by INFORRM
He gave Article 23 DPD a very narrow reading, contrary to CJEU decisions such as Case C–168/00 Leitner v TUI Deutschland GmbH [2002] ECR I–1631 (ECLI:EU:C:2002:163; ECJ, 12 March 2002), which held that compensation for “damage” must include both material and non-material damage, that is, both actual damage and distress (see also Case C-63/09 Walz v Clickair SA [2010] ECR I 4239 (ECLI:EU:C:2010:251; CJEU, 6 May 2010); Case… [read post]
18 Oct 2019, 4:24 pm by INFORRM
 In her statement to the Commons, the Secretary of State said [with added links]: Protecting children is at the heart of our online harms agenda, and is key to wider Government priorities. [read post]
17 Sep 2019, 8:03 am by Daily Record Staff
Criminal procedure — Motion to suppress evidence — Other crimes At the conclusion of a three-day jury trial in the Circuit Court for Prince George’s County, appellant, Percy Odell Williams, was found guilty of one count of third-degree sex offense and two counts of sexual abuse of a minor. [read post]
12 Jul 2017, 4:15 pm by INFORRM
Moreover, the US Department of State Human Rights Report for Uganda cites examples to unlawful killings and torture, and other abuses of detainees and suspects. [read post]
9 May 2017, 4:30 pm by INFORRM
But, by the end of the 1800s, this rationale lost currency, and by 1917 (in Bowman v Secular Society [1917] AC 406), the House of Lords held that blasphemy protected the religious sensitivities of the individual; but the courts still confined the scope of the offence to the established Church (this was confirmed as recently as 1991 in R v Chief Metropolitan Stipendiary Magistrate, ex parte Choudhury [1991] 1 QB 429). [read post]
5 Jan 2017, 4:02 pm by INFORRM
But the differences with other European Union member states are even more striking, according to IPI research. [read post]
27 Sep 2016, 4:20 pm by INFORRM
He too considered Bonnard v Perryman and Reynolds v Malocco, as well as the hugely-influential decision of Clarke J in Cogley v RTE [2005] 4 IR 79, [2005] IEHC 180 (8 June 2005). [read post]
4 Jul 2016, 4:07 pm by INFORRM
I agree – if Kennedy and Sullivan are anything to go by, the levels are not very high (especially by comparison with damages for defamation; see Mosley v News Group Newspapers [2008] EWHC 1777 (QB) (24 July 2008) [212] (Eady J); though note also Representative Claimants v MGN Ltd [2016] 2 WLR 1217, [2015] EWCA Civ 1291 (17 December 2015)). [read post]
3 May 2016, 10:41 am by INFORRM
For all that reform of our defamation law is undoubtedly necessary, we must not over-state the problems. [read post]
31 Aug 2015, 8:29 am by Laura Davis, AFPD, FDSET
Very quick, unpublished opinion today in United States v. [read post]
10 Jul 2015, 4:06 pm by INFORRM
In the process, the divergent conclusions in Johnson v Medical Defence Union [2007] EWCA Civ 262 (28 March 2007) and the earlier Irish case ofCollins v FBD Insurance plc [2013] IEHC 137 (14 March 2013) (interpreting the frankly odd section 7 of the Data Protection Act, 1988 (also here)) were rejected. [read post]
10 Apr 2013, 11:44 am by Robert Odell
Freeze has stated on their blog: “Ironically, Bingham McCutchen knew their arbitration agreement, as originally drafted, was invalid in light of a 2009 Massachusetts Supreme Court opinion: Warfield v. [read post]