Search for: "Odell v. State" Results 21 - 31 of 31
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Oct 2019, 4:24 pm by INFORRM
 In her statement to the Commons, the Secretary of State said [with added links]: Protecting children is at the heart of our online harms agenda, and is key to wider Government priorities. [read post]
25 Jan 2013, 4:50 am by INFORRM
Indeed, it is still the case that no conversation about the state of the Irish economy is complete without a disparaging reference to him. [read post]
10 Mar 2020, 4:36 am by INFORRM
On those aspects which reach the Court, there will be uniformity in the Member States. [read post]
9 May 2017, 4:30 pm by INFORRM
But, by the end of the 1800s, this rationale lost currency, and by 1917 (in Bowman v Secular Society [1917] AC 406), the House of Lords held that blasphemy protected the religious sensitivities of the individual; but the courts still confined the scope of the offence to the established Church (this was confirmed as recently as 1991 in R v Chief Metropolitan Stipendiary Magistrate, ex parte Choudhury [1991] 1 QB 429). [read post]
3 May 2016, 10:41 am by INFORRM
For all that reform of our defamation law is undoubtedly necessary, we must not over-state the problems. [read post]