Search for: "Offer v. McMillan" Results 21 - 40 of 62
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Dec 2018, 4:00 am by Administrator
This excerpt chronicles Donald’s journey to defend Mi’kmaw treaty rights in the Supreme Court of Canada and sets the stage for understanding the impacts of R. v. [read post]
18 Mar 2008, 12:27 pm
Their work, mixed with some posts produced by our already established group of bloggers, offers up yet another batch of news. [read post]
27 Nov 2009, 3:29 pm by Mary Whisner
The presentation will include a review of the federal court litigation filed in Seattle that eventually led to the United States Supreme Court 2006 landmark Hamdan v. [read post]
28 Mar 2017, 7:19 am by Amy Howe
They could have offered the jury a competing theory – one that was consistent with both McMillan’s record and the crime-scene evidence. [read post]
3 Mar 2022, 10:08 am by Georgialee Lang
  The standard of review was considered a settled question in British Columbia based on McMillan v. [read post]
6 Aug 2012, 11:51 am by Zoe Tillman
Second, they argued that prosecutors withheld potentially exculpatory evidence in violation of the precedent set in Brady v. [read post]
26 Oct 2007, 9:56 am
American Collections Enterprise, Inc., 377 F.3d 488 (5th Cir. 2004), and the eighth issue, in that the Seventh Circuit holds that whether representations are “false, deceptive, or misleading” under the FDCPA are not questions of law, see McMillan v. [read post]
1 Apr 2012, 2:52 pm by VMaryAbraham
For those of you who really believe in the power of PowerPoint to reach an audience,  I offer the following demonstration by Don McMillan entitled Life After Death by PowerPoint: www.youtube.com/watch? [read post]
1 Jan 2012, 8:19 am by J. Gordon Hylton
Forty-five years ago, the baseball world trained its attention on the Wisconsin Supreme Court and its impending decision in the case of Wisconsin v. [read post]
23 Apr 2015, 3:33 pm by Richard M. Re
McMillan expressly “derived” their subjective standard “from one articulated by Judge Friendly in Johnson v. [read post]