Search for: "Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Grant "
Results 21 - 40
of 345
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 May 2019, 8:04 am
Upon discovering Kurtzrock’s violation of Brady v. [read post]
14 Sep 2017, 4:00 am
Supreme Court granted the Commissioner's motion to dismiss Officer's petition and Officer appealed.Officer had been served with disciplinary charges pursuant to Civil Service Law §75 alleging various acts of misconduct included making "false entries in the . . . enhanced security post logbook. [read post]
16 Dec 2013, 7:56 am
Disciplinary Counsel v. [read post]
14 Oct 2016, 3:25 am
However, it was held in that case: “In our view we have reached a stage in our onward march to fair play in action that where in an enquiry before a domestic tribunal the delinquent officer is pitted against a legally trained mind, if he seeks permission to appear through a legal practitioner the refusal to grant this request would amount to denial of a reasonable request to defend himself and the essential principles of natural justice would be violated.... [read post]
14 Oct 2016, 3:25 am
However, it was held in that case: “In our view we have reached a stage in our onward march to fair play in action that where in an enquiry before a domestic tribunal the delinquent officer is pitted against a legally trained mind, if he seeks permission to appear through a legal practitioner the refusal to grant this request would amount to denial of a reasonable request to defend himself and the essential principles of natural justice would be violated.... [read post]
15 Nov 2013, 9:32 am
United States v. [read post]
16 Mar 2012, 5:17 pm
The desired effect of this motion is an order granting defense access to the officer's personnel file. [read post]
1 Aug 2012, 4:00 am
Given the hearing officer’s conclusion that the school district had failed to prove the sole charge presented, the court opined that “it certainly cannot be a violation of public policy to decline to impose a penalty or to require counseling or supervision” under these circumstances. [read post]
10 Feb 2017, 10:03 am
”) At Oral Argument Arguing Counsel Joseph M. [read post]
18 Nov 2014, 2:28 pm
Office of Disciplinary Counsel — may need some updating. [read post]
31 Jan 2011, 4:05 am
Accordingly, said the court, the hearing officer’s decision to go forward with the disciplinary hearing in Toolasprashad's absence was arbitrary and capricious.The Mari decision [Mari v Safir, 291 AD2d 298, motion for leave to appeal denied, 98 NY2d 613] sets out the general standards applied by the courts in resolving litigation resulting from conducting a disciplinary hearing in absentia.The decision demonstrates that an individual against whom… [read post]
19 Sep 2014, 4:00 am
The decision demonstrates that an individual against whom disciplinary charges have been filed cannot avoid the consequences of disciplinary action being taken against him or her by refusing to appear at the disciplinary hearing. [read post]
6 Nov 2010, 5:54 am
Ultimately the Court of Appeals considered the matter in terms of a court's authority to overturn or modify an administrative disciplinary decision or a disciplinary penalty imposed on a worker [Kelly v Safir, 96 N.Y.2d 32].The Court of Appeals, ruled:1. [read post]
10 Oct 2014, 3:00 am
It was granted. [read post]
27 Apr 2021, 4:32 pm
The trial court, constrained by the Santa Ana POA decision, granted the petition and precluded the use of the officers’ interrogation testimony for disciplinary purposes. [read post]
21 May 2009, 4:05 am
Appointing authority's final determination as whether or not to take disciplinary action against an employee controlsRosenblum v New York City Conflicts of Interest Board, 2009 NY Slip Op 31073(U), April 29, 2009, Supreme Court, New York County, Docket Number: 101121/09, Judge Jane S. [read post]
13 May 2022, 4:36 am
EOIR’s Disciplinary Counsel is assisted by one attorney (an Assistant Disciplinary Counsel) and one investigator. [read post]
15 Feb 2016, 7:05 am
Lewis v. [read post]
31 Dec 2019, 4:47 am
Freer v. [read post]
12 Jan 2023, 4:00 pm
On the ninth day of jury selection in the case of United States of America v. [read post]
