Search for: "Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Grant " Results 41 - 60 of 345
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Dec 2017, 4:00 am by Administrator
In November 2014, an arbitrator upheld the grievances in part, but did not grant the officer a remedy requiring the employment restrictions to be lifted, either at that time or at a specific time in the future. [read post]
5 Nov 2010, 4:10 am
”The court noted that, as Titone’s Counsel “adeptly points out that, rather than investigating the fact that rescue equipment was in need of repair, they rushed to punish [Titone] for abiding by his oath to protect and serve the public. [read post]
17 Dec 2018, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Ctr., 57 NY2d 399, and Karlin v McMahon, 96 NY2d 842, unanimously reversed the lower court's ruling explaining these two decisions provided "controlling precedent" and thus it could not "order [NYPD] to disclose redacted versions of the disciplinary decisions.The Court of Appeals said that the disciplinary decisions requested by the NYCLU are quintessential "personnel records" protected by Civil Rights Law §50-a, a statute designed to… [read post]
17 Dec 2018, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Ctr., 57 NY2d 399, and Karlin v McMahon, 96 NY2d 842, unanimously reversed the lower court's ruling explaining these two decisions provided "controlling precedent" and thus it could not "order [NYPD] to disclose redacted versions of the disciplinary decisions.The Court of Appeals said that the disciplinary decisions requested by the NYCLU are quintessential "personnel records" protected by Civil Rights Law §50-a, a statute designed to… [read post]
5 Jul 2019, 4:15 am by Public Employment Law Press
An Office of Mental Health [OMH] employee [Petitioner] was served with a notice of discipline [NOD] charging Petitioner with misconduct and, or, incompetency alleging that he struck and kicked a service recipient.* Pursuant to the collective bargaining agreement between Petitioner's Collective Bargaining Organization and OMH, a disciplinary hearing was held before an arbitrator, during which hearing videos of the incident were shown. [read post]
7 Feb 2018, 12:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
[Stapleton v La Paglia, 207 AD2d 945]Terminating a corrections officer who used excessive force against a prisoner while going to the aid of a fellow officer who has struggling with the inmate. [read post]
12 Feb 2008, 10:47 am
A new decision is out from CAAF today: United States v. [read post]
29 Mar 2010, 8:53 pm by cdw
LEXIS 975 (Ohio App 9th 3/24/2010)  Postconviction relief denied on appeal on issues relating to failure to permit discovery, funding experts, ineffective assistance of counsel (trial court chose wrong standard to examine claims, failure to investigate and present, use of experts (cultural, DNA & neurological), as well as “lead counsel’s substance abuse, disciplinary investigation, and, ultimately, his arrest”) Ruben Gutierrez v. [read post]
27 Feb 2012, 4:18 pm by Brad Pauley
  Review Granted Grant on Discipline, S197503 – Petition for writ of review Granted – February 22, 2012 This attorney disciplinary proceeding grew out of an attorney’s guilty plea to felony possession of child pornography. [read post]
11 Jun 2021, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
A public authority [Employer] filed disciplinary charges against an officer of the Employer [Plaintiff] pursuant to Civil Service Law §75 alleging that Plaintiff had made a number of unauthorized purchases using "agency-issued" credit cards. [read post]
11 Jun 2021, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
A public authority [Employer] filed disciplinary charges against an officer of the Employer [Plaintiff] pursuant to Civil Service Law §75 alleging that Plaintiff had made a number of unauthorized purchases using "agency-issued" credit cards. [read post]
11 Jun 2021, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
A public authority [Employer] filed disciplinary charges against an officer of the Employer [Plaintiff] pursuant to Civil Service Law §75 alleging that Plaintiff had made a number of unauthorized purchases using "agency-issued" credit cards. [read post]
11 Jun 2021, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
A public authority [Employer] filed disciplinary charges against an officer of the Employer [Plaintiff] pursuant to Civil Service Law §75 alleging that Plaintiff had made a number of unauthorized purchases using "agency-issued" credit cards. [read post]
11 Jul 2018, 7:09 am by Joy Waltemath
Granting summary judgment, the district court had found that another officer, who was not aware of Spangler’s protected activity, alone made the decision to demote him. [read post]