Search for: "Ogden v. State" Results 1 - 20 of 265
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Apr 2024, 9:01 pm by renholding
While Custodia is subject to state prudential regulation, it is not FDIC-insured or subject to federal prudential regulation and does not have a holding company subject to Federal Reserve oversight. [read post]
16 Feb 2024, 9:30 pm by ernst
The Union County Board of County Commissioners is hosting Gibbons v. [read post]
5 Jul 2023, 4:09 pm by Sean Wajert
Ogden, 9 Wheat. 1, 194–196, 6 L.Ed. 23 (1824)). [read post]
5 Jul 2023, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Decided on June 30, 2023 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department PRESENT: SMITH, J.P., LINDLEY, CURRAN, MONTOUR, AND OGDEN, JJ. 329 CA 22-00889 IN THE MATTER OF ARBITRATION BETWEEN COUNTY OF ONONDAGA, PETITIONER-RESPONDENT, AND and CIVIL SERVICE EMPLOYEES ASSOCIATION, INC., ONONDAGA COUNTY LOCAL 834, RESPONDENT-APPELLANT. [read post]
5 Jul 2023, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Decided on June 30, 2023 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department PRESENT: SMITH, J.P., LINDLEY, CURRAN, MONTOUR, AND OGDEN, JJ. 329 CA 22-00889 IN THE MATTER OF ARBITRATION BETWEEN COUNTY OF ONONDAGA, PETITIONER-RESPONDENT, AND and CIVIL SERVICE EMPLOYEES ASSOCIATION, INC., ONONDAGA COUNTY LOCAL 834, RESPONDENT-APPELLANT. [read post]
19 Jun 2023, 2:19 pm by Josh Blackman
In my earlier post, I mentioned this passage reminded me of United States v. [read post]
4 Apr 2023, 12:46 am by Anthony Gaughan
Later, a version of interposition termed “Judicial Federalism” emerged as a constraint on federal legislative power in Printz v. [read post]
3 Apr 2023, 2:22 am by INFORRM
On 29 March 2023, judgment was handed down by Saini J in the3million & Anor, R (On the Application Of) v Secretary of State for the Home Department & Anor [2023] EWHC 713 (Admin). [read post]
18 Jan 2023, 5:00 am by Michael C. Dorf
Thus, for example, Justice Thomas (in his concurrence in United States v. [read post]
3 Jan 2023, 5:00 am by Timothy Bonis
Michael Young cites the Court’s 1995 ruling in United States v. [read post]
9 Nov 2022, 4:00 am by Guest Author
  A proper application of nondelegation principles (an issue not considered by the Supreme Court in Trump v. [read post]
5 Jan 2022, 3:40 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
The policy stated that the beneficiary was named in the application and referred the reader to an attached copy of the application, which listed the son’s girlfriend as a beneficiary. [read post]