Search for: "Ohio v. American Express Co" Results 121 - 140 of 229
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Aug 2010, 1:50 pm by Bexis
American Honda Motor Co., 529 U.S. 861 (2000), which didn’t involve any challenge to the validity of the government’s decision that the automobiles in question met federal standards and could be sold, and Riegel v. [read post]
29 Oct 2009, 5:58 am
It's kept it up ever since: Western Express, Inc. v. [read post]
3 Aug 2018, 4:24 am by Edith Roberts
American Express Co., in which the court held that Amex’s anti-steering rules do not violate federal antitrust law, “seem to mask is a fundamental clash of principle about the need for judicial intervention in economic markets. [read post]
2 Sep 2009, 11:22 pm
All of the federalism concerns expressed in Buckman still apply. [read post]
20 Jan 2015, 12:00 am
 [8]Most would agree that incorporating a well-known actor’s image into a video game without express permission is risky, if not downright reckless, but a right of publicity claim can be brought for something less obvious. [read post]
11 Mar 2016, 10:02 am by John Elwood
The big new relist this week is Samsung Electronics Co. v. [read post]
24 May 2007, 10:40 am
Supp. 151, 156-57 (S.D.N.Y. 1988).Deference to the FDA was the express basis of the decision in Ramirez v. [read post]
4 Nov 2017, 3:35 am by Guest
Background Linde AG, a German entity (“Linde Hold Co”), the ultimate holding company of LIL, is proposing to enter into a business combination arrangement (“BCA”) with Praxair Inc (“Praxair”), an American company, in the following manner: 1. [read post]