Search for: "Ohio v. Roberts" Results 41 - 60 of 1,361
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Jun 2023, 7:09 pm by Jacob Fishman
Part V concludes with a report card on how the regime is doing on its thirtieth anniversary. [read post]
17 Jun 2023, 6:03 pm by Josh Blackman
Also on Thursday, the Supreme Court decided Lac du Flambeau Band of Lake Superior Chippewa Indians v. [read post]
22 May 2023, 7:46 am by Eric Goldman
(The defense team included lawyers from Jaburg & Wilk, Wilenchik & Bartness, and the Law Office of Robert W Shely). [read post]
19 May 2023, 4:03 pm by Mark Walsh
Justice Clarence Thomas delivers the 7-2 decision in the labor dispute Ohio Adjutant General’s Department v. [read post]
4 May 2023, 9:05 pm by renholding
It is a common refrain, mostly on the political right, that considering environmental, social, and governance (“ESG”) factors when investing is probably illegal.[1] The basis for this argument derives from the fiduciary duty of loyalty and its corollary, the “sole interest” or “exclusive benefit” rule, enshrined in both federal and state law, which prohibits fiduciaries from investing for any purpose other than the financial well-being of the beneficiary. [read post]
20 Apr 2023, 8:00 am
"Since such conduct violated Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, the EEOC filed its lawsuit (EEOC v. [read post]
18 Apr 2023, 5:16 am by Eric Columbus
He points to the Supreme Court’s 2020 decision in Trump v. [read post]
6 Apr 2023, 9:05 pm by Victoria Hawekotte
Supreme Court’s decision in West Virginia v. [read post]
29 Mar 2023, 1:02 pm by Eugene Volokh
There is a serious side to this case – Ohio is, after all, the state whose right of publicity laws produced Zacchini v. [read post]
29 Mar 2023, 5:01 am by Eugene Volokh
If you just blithely ignore it, and publish the story despite having been told that it may well be mistaken, that would be textbook "reckless disregard," which would allow liability even in a public official case: Consider, for instance, Harte-Hanks Communications, Inc. v. [read post]
27 Mar 2023, 1:25 am by INFORRM
On 24 March 2023, there was a hearing in the case of Hayden v Family Education Trust. [read post]
24 Mar 2023, 3:00 pm by John A. Emmons, Avery Schmitz
Robert Loeb provided a synopsis of Bahlul v. [read post]
8 Mar 2023, 5:16 am by Quinta Jurecic, Alan Z. Rozenshtein
Ohio nor by the doctrine of presidential immunity as established by the Supreme Court in Nixon v. [read post]
3 Mar 2023, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
National/Federal Indian Americans Rapidly Climbing Political Ranks DNyuz – Maggie Astor and Jill Cowan (New York Times) | Published: 2/27/2023 Despite being one of the largest immigrant groups in the U.S., Americans of Indian descent in 20123 were barely represented in politics. [read post]
28 Feb 2023, 11:55 am by admin
“It has been said that though God cannot alter the past, historians can; it is perhaps because they can be useful to Him in this respect that He tolerates their existence. [read post]