Search for: "Ohio v. Roberts" Results 161 - 180 of 1,007
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Apr 2014, 4:11 am by Amy Howe
Driehaus, the Court will consider a First Amendment challenge to an Ohio law that criminalizes false political statements. [read post]
12 Jun 2018, 4:06 am by Edith Roberts
” For The Washington Post Robert Barnes notes that the case “is one of several in which the Trump administration switched sides; the Obama administration had backed challengers of Ohio’s process. [read post]
23 Mar 2012, 4:01 pm by Colin O'Keefe
I promise I’m not trying to beat you over the head with Sackett v. [read post]
30 Mar 2015, 2:36 pm
As Judith Schaeffer explained on Slate last week, then-Judge John Roberts said the same thing at his SCOTUS confirmation hearing. [read post]
4 Mar 2014, 10:34 am
Ohio suggested that “all” unconstitutionally obtained evidence must be suppressed, but Herring v. [read post]
2 Jun 2015, 9:05 pm by Walter Olson
Ohio appeals court: code enforcement officers in town of Riverside can be personally liable for towing cars off man’s property without due process [The Newspaper; Vlcek v. [read post]
20 Jan 2015, 9:25 pm by Patricia Salkin
Editor’s Note: Hat Tip to Robert Thomas, Esq. at the InverseCondemnation Blog for this post: http://www.inversecondemnation.com ; see a photo and more about this case: http://www.inversecondemnation.com/inversecondemnation/2014/12/ohio-app-inconveniences-caused-by-highway-construction-not-a-taking.html Sommer v. [read post]
30 Jun 2017, 3:05 am by NCC Staff
The states of Oregon and Texas fought the Voting Rights Act provision and a divided Supreme Court, in Oregon v. [read post]
30 Jun 2016, 3:05 am by NCC Staff
The states of Oregon and Texas fought the Voting Rights Act provision and a divided Supreme Court, in Oregon v. [read post]
21 Mar 2011, 7:36 am by Jake Ward
The featured speaker at lunch was Robert Bahr, Associate Commissioner for Patent Examination Policy, U.S. [read post]
3 Apr 2011, 5:24 am
The Circuit Court ruled that Wasson lacked standing because she did not show that she had any relationship to, or with, the alleged anonymous writer, the second prong of the three-prong test set out in Powers v Ohio, 499 US 400. [read post]