Search for: "Ohio v. Robinette"
Results 1 - 20
of 38
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Jan 2015, 12:21 pm
On February 3, 2015, the Supreme Court of Ohio will hear oral argument in the case of State of Ohio v. [read post]
29 Jan 2015, 8:30 am
Robinette, 1997-Ohio-343, (Robinette III) the Supreme Court of Ohio chose the latter course, but held that under federal law, the search in the case was not consensual. [read post]
16 Oct 2017, 5:51 am
Robinette, 1997-Ohio-343, (Robinette III)( the interpretation of Article I, Section 14 of the Ohio Constitution and the Fourth Amendment should be harmonized unless there are persuasive reasons to find otherwise.) [read post]
10 Feb 2008, 2:08 am
Robinette, 80 Ohio St.3d 234, 245, 1997 Ohio 343, 685 N.E.2d 762, in State v. [read post]
9 Aug 2016, 11:22 am
Ohio first joined this movement in 1993 in Arnold v. [read post]
6 Feb 2015, 7:13 am
On February 3, 2015, the Supreme Court of Ohio heard oral argument in the case of State of Ohio v. [read post]
29 Dec 2007, 8:27 am
Frye, 2007 Ohio 6941, 2007 Ohio App. [read post]
29 Jun 2015, 6:58 am
Robinette , 80 Ohio St.3d 234, 1997-Ohio-343 (1997) (Robinette III) ( “Case law indicates that, consistent with Robinette II, we should harmonize our interpretation of Section 14, Article I of the Ohio Constitution with the Fourth Amendment, unless there are persuasive reasons to find otherwise. [read post]
18 Mar 2015, 8:24 am
On March 10, 2015, the Supreme Court of Ohio heard oral argument in the case of State of Ohio v. [read post]
3 Mar 2012, 9:23 pm
State v. [read post]
9 Mar 2017, 8:38 am
” Justice O’Donnell, to the prosecutor On March 1, 2017, the Supreme Court of Ohio heard oral argument in the case of State of Ohio v. [read post]
8 Apr 2010, 4:06 am
Ohio v. [read post]
6 Nov 2014, 4:42 am
On November 4, 2014, the Supreme Court of Ohio handed down a merit decision in State v. [read post]
15 Oct 2012, 8:40 am
Robinette, 80 Ohio St.3d 234, 1997-Ohio-343, 685 N.E.2d 762, that, after the purposes of a traffic stop have been completed, an officer may not ask the driver for permission to search his vehicle. [read post]
14 Jul 2009, 12:08 am
In Ohio v. [read post]
1 Mar 2017, 4:10 am
Keep in mind that the above-discussed Harris and Reittinger cases succeed, and thus limit the effect of, the United States Supreme Court’s Ohio v. [read post]
29 Jun 2010, 4:41 am
He need not even have been informed explicitly that he was free to go, Ohio v. [read post]
30 Aug 2010, 5:54 am
Ed. 2d 299 (2005), and Ohio v. [read post]
9 May 2007, 5:11 am
Ohio v. [read post]
16 Sep 2010, 2:28 am
As a general matter, per se rules are anathema to the Fourth Amendment, see Ohio v. [read post]
