Search for: "Ohio v. Robinette" Results 1 - 20 of 38
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Jan 2020, 8:16 pm by Jerry Salcido
Reasonableness “is measured … by examining the totality of the circumstances,” (Id. citing to Ohio v. [read post]
16 Oct 2017, 5:51 am by MBettman
Robinette, 1997-Ohio-343, (Robinette III)( the interpretation of Article I, Section 14  of the Ohio Constitution and the Fourth Amendment should be harmonized unless there are persuasive reasons to find otherwise.) [read post]
9 Mar 2017, 8:38 am by MBettman
” Justice O’Donnell, to the prosecutor On March 1, 2017, the Supreme Court of Ohio heard oral argument in the case of State of Ohio v. [read post]
1 Mar 2017, 4:10 am by Jon Katz
Keep in mind that the above-discussed Harris and Reittinger cases succeed, and thus limit the effect of, the United States Supreme Court’s Ohio v. [read post]
29 Jun 2015, 6:58 am by MBettman
Robinette , 80 Ohio St.3d 234, 1997-Ohio-343 (1997) (Robinette III) ( “Case law indicates that, consistent with Robinette II, we should harmonize our interpretation of Section 14, Article I of the Ohio Constitution with the Fourth Amendment, unless there are persuasive reasons to find otherwise. [read post]
6 Feb 2015, 7:13 am by MBettman
On February 3, 2015, the Supreme Court of Ohio heard oral argument in the case of State of Ohio v. [read post]
29 Jan 2015, 8:30 am by MBettman
Robinette, 1997-Ohio-343, (Robinette III) the Supreme Court of Ohio chose the latter course, but held that under federal law, the search in the case was not consensual. [read post]
25 Dec 2013, 6:16 am
Knights, 534 U.S. 112 (2001) (quoting Ohio v. [read post]
15 Oct 2012, 8:40 am by adamengel
Robinette, 80 Ohio St.3d 234, 1997-Ohio-343, 685 N.E.2d 762,  that, after the purposes of a traffic stop have been completed, an officer may not ask the driver for permission to search his vehicle. [read post]
24 Apr 2012, 4:02 am by Walter Olson
(0) Watch what you tell your hairdresser, cont’d (5) Update: rude doctor won’t be punished, plans suit (5) Update: McLeod v. [read post]