Search for: "Ohio v. United States" Results 1 - 20 of 3,051
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Jul 2020, 7:24 am by Peter Shane
Davis II Chair in Law at the Ohio State University Moritz College of Law. [read post]
8 Jul 2020, 4:30 am by Josh Blackman
If any part of the act be unconstitutional, the provisions of that part may be disregarded while full effect will be given to such as are not repugnant to the constitution of the United States or of the state or to the ordinance of 1787. [read post]
7 Jul 2020, 2:52 pm by Lauren Moxley and Shane Rogers
United States, that the Fourth Amendment applies to cell phone company records that detail a cell phone user’s location and movements. [read post]
1 Jul 2020, 2:31 pm by Michele Goodwin
The Page Act, which restricted Chinese women from entering the United States, is a part of this shameful legacy. [read post]
17 Jun 2020, 5:57 am by Eric Segall
In our entire history, there have been only ten African-American United States Senators. [read post]
16 Jun 2020, 8:39 am by Mansell Law
On June 15, 2020, the United States Supreme Court published its decision in Bostock v. [read post]
16 Jun 2020, 8:29 am by Eugene Volokh
Caplan, and myself, and argued at the Ohio Court of Appeals stage and at the Ohio Supreme Court stage; many thanks to pro bono local counsel Karin L. [read post]
12 Jun 2020, 9:46 am by Rachel Brown, Coleman Saunders
Ohio (1961), there remains no fixed test for reasonableness. [read post]
8 Jun 2020, 9:01 pm by Austin Sarat
Ohio, it held that the Eighth and Fourteenth Amendments of the United States Constitution required, in all but the rarest capital cases, that sentencers be allowed to consider a range of mitigating factors before imposing the death penalty. [read post]
5 Jun 2020, 11:00 pm by Robert L. Mues
 According to a study released on May 25, 2020 by the Williams Institute on Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity Law at UCLA , same-sex weddings have generated $3.8 billion in local and state economic activity in the United States since the Supreme Court legalized gay marriage five years ago this month in Obergefell v. [read post]
5 Jun 2020, 3:54 pm by fvanloon
The court ordered the county to hold back 25% of any unspent funds until the court can fully consider the merits of our taxpayer lawsuit (Bauer, et al, v. [read post]
5 Jun 2020, 11:18 am by Schachtman
 The Act gave all participants in a qualifying “professional review action” immunity from being held liable in damages “under any law of the United States or of any State (or political subdivision thereof) with respect to the action. [read post]
3 Jun 2020, 10:07 am by Guest Blogger
Supreme Court’s decision in Financial Oversight and Management Bd. v. [read post]
28 May 2020, 5:29 am by Schachtman
”[5] This rejection of the clear demands of a statute has infected even the intermediate appellate United States Court of Appeals. [read post]