Search for: "Oklahoma Natural Gas Co. v. Oklahoma" Results 21 - 40 of 54
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Jun 2013, 7:05 pm by Mary Dwyer
Oklahoma Coalition for Reproductive Justice 12-1094Issue: Whether the Oklahoma Supreme Court erred in holding – without analysis or discussion – that the Oklahoma law requiring that abortion-inducing drugs be administered according to the protocol described on the drugs’ FDA-approved labels is facially unconstitutional under Planned Parenthood v. [read post]
11 Nov 2014, 4:19 pm by Steven Boutwell
State agencies, including those in Arkansas, Colorado, Louisiana, North Dakota, Ohio, Oklahoma and Texas, have all reported to the U.S. [read post]
18 Jan 2013, 2:06 pm by Bexis
(citations omitted).Third, the economic incentives are all wrong, as non-manufacturer liability rewards questionable practices by generic manufacturers and penalizes more careful competitors:Careful Drug Co. gets word from the field that its drug, “X”, might cure high blood pressure when a doctor comes to it with a case series. [read post]
6 May 2016, 12:30 pm
Sanchez, 997 S.W.2d 584, 592 (Tex. 1999); Hyundai Motor Co. v. [read post]
16 Nov 2012, 1:50 pm by Bexis
Southern Regional Medical Center, Inc., 504 S.E.2d 747, 749 (Ga. [read post]
12 Jan 2012, 1:15 pm by Bexis
Appx. 689, 693 (10th Cir. 2011) (Phelan principle “ is especially true when a federal court is asked to make a policy laden choice for the State of Utah”); Northern Natural Gas Co. v. [read post]
14 May 2012, 8:24 am by Schachtman
Today, the nature of the asbestos litigation has changed, but it when we examine Pennsylvania law and procedure, it is not surprising to see that Dr. [read post]
27 Oct 2013, 10:36 am by Sam Capasso
NYSDEC Proposes Liquefied Natural Gas Regulations In a portent of things to come, the DEC will hold a hearing and solicit public comment on proposed regulations for liquefied natural gas (LNG) facilities. [read post]
23 Mar 2017, 6:08 am by Sarah Tate Chambers
’” Comparing Kazaa to a self-service gas station, Judge Gorsuch has no trouble finding that Shaffer distributed child pornography. [read post]
7 Feb 2008, 10:46 am
Id. at 230 (FDA "d[id] not include" Plaintiffs' claimed requirement); 230 (Plaintiffs' claim "at best a tenuous assertion and, at worst, an outright mischaracterization of the record"); 230 ("the record flatly contradicts plaintiffs' position"); 231 (describing "specious nature of plaintiffs' claim"); 231-32 (claims based upon "inapplicable" materials). [read post]