Search for: "Oliphant v. Suquamish Indian Tribe" Results 1 - 20 of 30
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
” Justice Stephen Breyer, writing for the unanimous court, reviewed Montana v United States and identified two exemptions to the general rule that the “inherent sovereign powers of an [Indigenous] tribe do not extend to the activities of nonmembers” [Oliphant v Suquamish Tribe, 1978]. [read post]
2 Mar 2021, 11:46 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
Suquamish Indian Tribe stripped tribes of most criminal prosecutions against non-Indians. [read post]
26 Aug 2019, 9:30 pm by Dan Ernst
Suquamish Indian Tribe that non-Indians were not subject to tribal prosecution for criminal offenses. [read post]
15 Aug 2018, 6:21 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
Suquamish Indian Tribe—a framework that stripped Tribal Nations of their inherent authority to protect Native women from non-Indian perpetrated violence. [read post]
22 Aug 2016, 4:57 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
Suquamish Indian Tribe—can have significant consequences for the future of tribal criminal jurisdiction. [read post]
8 Dec 2015, 7:22 pm by Ed Gehres
Suquamish Indian Tribe, presenting a thorough framework of both history and constitutional concerns that urged the Court towards a broad rule. [read post]
30 Nov 2015, 6:45 pm by Ed Gehres
Suquamish Indian Tribe in 1978, and it urges the Court to reach the same conclusion for civil matters. [read post]
24 Dec 2014, 3:54 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
Suquamish Indian Tribe in the American Indian Journal: American Indian Journal article Of particular note is the prediction that non-Indian crime would go unpunished. [read post]
31 Mar 2014, 1:47 pm by Kurt Carroll
Suquamish Indian Tribe, tribes have not had this level of jurisdictional authority. [read post]
22 Feb 2014, 6:00 am by Mary Whisner
Suquamish Indian Tribe, by Sarah KrakoffA Step Backward in the Government's Representation of Tribes: The story of Nevada v. [read post]
21 Feb 2014, 12:19 pm by
This legislative revision of the VAWA was necessary to overcome the 1978 Supreme Court decision, Oliphant v. [read post]