Search for: "Oliphant v. Suquamish Indian Tribe" Results 21 - 36 of 36
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
” Justice Stephen Breyer, writing for the unanimous court, reviewed Montana v United States and identified two exemptions to the general rule that the “inherent sovereign powers of an [Indigenous] tribe do not extend to the activities of nonmembers” [Oliphant v Suquamish Tribe, 1978]. [read post]
8 Dec 2015, 7:22 pm by Ed Gehres
Suquamish Indian Tribe, presenting a thorough framework of both history and constitutional concerns that urged the Court towards a broad rule. [read post]
22 Aug 2016, 4:57 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
Suquamish Indian Tribe—can have significant consequences for the future of tribal criminal jurisdiction. [read post]
22 Feb 2014, 6:00 am by Mary Whisner
Suquamish Indian Tribe, by Sarah KrakoffA Step Backward in the Government's Representation of Tribes: The story of Nevada v. [read post]
15 Aug 2018, 6:21 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
Suquamish Indian Tribe—a framework that stripped Tribal Nations of their inherent authority to protect Native women from non-Indian perpetrated violence. [read post]
31 Mar 2014, 1:47 pm by Kurt Carroll
Suquamish Indian Tribe, tribes have not had this level of jurisdictional authority. [read post]
25 Mar 2009, 7:00 am
Suquamish Indian Tribe where the United State Supreme Court detailed the history of the congressional presumption that Indian tribes did not have criminal jurisdiction over non-Indians on reservations and then stated that the tribes are to promptly deliver up any non-Indian offender rather than try and punish him themselves. [read post]
30 Nov 2011, 8:22 am by Kedar
Suquamish Indian Tribe (1978) (as Assistant to the Solicitor General) 5. [read post]