Search for: "Operating Engineers v. Jones" Results 61 - 80 of 132
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Jan 2021, 4:38 pm by INFORRM
Mishcon de Reya Data Matters had a piece “The EU/UK Trade and Co-operation Agreement: Digital Trade”. [read post]
26 Jul 2010, 9:08 am by Steven M. Taber
Jones, who owns and manages at least eight properties with at least 19 rental units, is responsible for 14 violations of federal lead-based paint disclosure laws in four [read post]
27 May 2018, 4:36 pm by INFORRM
Mischon de Reya has a series of articles on GDPR compliance ranging from the volume of emails received by users, frequent questions and the implications for domain name owner search engine Whois. [read post]
29 Jan 2023, 10:15 pm by GWS Law
Introduction A series of cases have established that QOCS makes it virtually impossible for Ds to recover costs from C when a claim settles; Cartwright v Venduct Engineering Ltd [2018] EWCA Civ 1654; [2018] 1 WLR 6137, Ho v Adelekun [2021] UKSC 43, [2021] WLR 5132 and (very recently) University Hospitals of Derby & Burton NHS  Foundation Trust v Harrison [2022] EWCA Civ 1660. [read post]
28 Dec 2021, 4:25 pm by INFORRM
Nettle v Cruse [2021] FCA 93 Sydney based plastic surgeon Dr Nettle refused to operate on Ms Cruse. [read post]
14 Jun 2019, 5:20 am by Jack Sharman
Court of Appeal’s decision in September 2018 in Director of the Serious Fraud Office v. [read post]
20 Feb 2009, 2:00 am
(Seattle Trademark Lawyer)   US Trade Marks – Decisions District Court S D Texas: Yahoo’s sale of competitive keyword ads isn’t false designation of origin: Heartbrand Beef, Inc v Lobel’s of New York, LLC (Technology & Marketing Law Blog) (Rebecca Tushnet's 43(B)log)   US Trade Marks – Lawsuits and strategic steps Jones Day – Jones Day, BlockShopper.com settle hyperlink trade mark… [read post]
2 Aug 2010, 11:15 am by Steven M. Taber
In accordance with federal regulations, as the owner or operator of a demolition activity, RIAC, Colan and Jones Payne were required to provide the Administrator with written notice of intention to demolish or renovate prior to the commencement of the activity. [read post]
23 Sep 2018, 4:07 pm by INFORRM
The matter at issue was whether the operation of section 32(4) of the Data Protection Act 1998, the implementation of a stay to proceedings, is consistent with Directive 95/46/EC or operates to compromise the freedom of expression and right to an effective remedy. [read post]