Search for: "Opinion of the Judges v Gould"
Results 1 - 20
of 265
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Jul 2016, 8:06 am
In an opinion by Judge Andrew Hurwitz, and joined by Judges Ronald Gould and Michael Melloy (sitting by designation from the Eighth Circuit), affirmed... [read post]
28 Feb 2017, 11:33 am
I thought that some of Judge Gould's opinion was spot on, but had my doubts about other parts.Defendants file a petition for rehearing, and Judge Graber is drawn to replace Judge Noonan.Now, Judge Gould files an amended opinion. [read post]
6 Jul 2016, 11:16 am
In an opinion by Judge Andrew Hurwitz, and joined by Judges Ronald Gould and Michael Melloy (sitting by designation from the Eighth Circuit), affirmed in part... [read post]
15 Feb 2007, 11:59 am
This is one of the best opinions I've ever read from Judge Gould. [read post]
15 Oct 2014, 11:19 am
Because Judge Smith has a total of four votes (including his own) for his proposed disposition, and then he gets three others (Judges Kozinski, Graber, and Gould) -- a total of seven -- to join that particular portion of his disposition.So you've got to skip around opinions to find the actual holdings.For The Three, Judge Gould writes a concurring opinion (for himself and Judges Kozinski and Graber) explaining their… [read post]
6 Sep 2016, 10:55 am
Ten judges disagree: "O’SCANNLAIN, Circuit Judge, with whom KOZINSKI, GOULD, TALLMAN, BYBEE, CALLAHAN, BEA, M. [read post]
21 Nov 2007, 9:38 am
Here's a very nice and tight opinion by Judge Gould. [read post]
27 Oct 2014, 11:57 am
Today's opinion from Judge Gould uses the former term. [read post]
2 Sep 2022, 10:15 am
Basically what Judge Gould says.Even though technically the result is contained in a two-page per curiam opinion that says basically nothing. [read post]
7 Jun 2013, 12:35 pm
I was moved by the introductory paragraphs of this opinion by Judge Gould. [read post]
2 Nov 2007, 11:55 am
Sometimes even a single line in the middle of a lengthy opinion can stand out and strike me as obviously -- and dangerously -- wrong.Like here.The per curiam opinion (joined only by Judges Ferris and Gould) says a lot of things I agree with. [read post]
31 Aug 2017, 3:21 pm
” Armstrong v. [read post]
17 May 2018, 9:58 am
But where it really gets interesting is the special concurring opinion by Judge Gould (joined by Judge Murguia) urging the 9th Circuit to review en banc whether anti-SLAPP rulings should be reviewable by interlocutory appeal. [read post]
13 Mar 2019, 6:11 pm
It's an opinion authored by Judge Gould that's joined by Judge Ikuta. [read post]
31 Mar 2014, 1:14 pm
Judge Bea, joined by Judge Gould, dissents. [read post]
8 Mar 2023, 9:29 am
Judge Graber, joined by Judges Gould and Watford, in No on E, San Franciscans Opposing the Affordable Housing Production Act v. [read post]
14 Nov 2008, 7:51 pm
As evidenced by the fact that the majority opinion on this issue, written by Judge Gould, doesn't obtain the asset of Judge Fernandez, who dissents.But there's an even larger, and more practically important, lesson to be learned as well. [read post]
21 Sep 2023, 12:57 pm
Indeed, in the memorandum disposition, Judge Gould -- the original author of the opinion granting relief -- doesn't even dissent. [read post]
28 Jan 2010, 1:52 pm
It may well be that 2009 was the "Year of the Ponzi Scheme," and Judge Gould makes a reference to exactly that in the second footnote of his opinion. [read post]
7 Jul 2010, 1:10 pm
Judge Gould writes a majority opinion that concludes by saying (in the process of remanding to the district court): "[W]e do not see how it can ever be incorrect, once the Supreme Court has vacated a circuit court decision and remanded for further assessment in light of one of its decisions, for the court of appeals simply to vacate the district court’s decision and to remand for further proceedings in the light of the pertinent Supreme Court decision. [read post]
