Search for: "Opinion of the Justices (Definition of Resident and Residence)"
Results 1 - 20
of 941
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Jul 2018, 12:49 pm
The New Hampshire Supreme Court [official website] found [opinion, PDF] Wednesday that a proposed bill redefining the definition of residency in New Hampshire is constitutional under both the state and US Constitutions despite the fact that it would require those who declare themselves residents in order to vote to abide by other requirements of residency such as obtaining a New Hampshire driver’s license if they drive. [read post]
22 Jun 2018, 8:16 am
” The post Opinion analysis: Court rejects agency interpretation of immigration statute, giving immigrant a chance at lawful residence appeared first on SCOTUSblog. [read post]
21 Mar 2017, 7:26 am
In denying summary judgment to both sides, Steuben County Supreme Court Justice Marianne Furfure held:In this case, the term "reside" is not defined in the policy and, therefore, it is possible that under the circumstances of this case, plaintiffs may be found to have resided at Pine Hill for insurance policy purposes even while they were caring for Mrs. [read post]
2 Jul 2018, 6:24 am
Unlike an offense, such as incitement to terrorism, an opinion cannot be the foundation for denial of residency status. [read post]
10 Jun 2019, 4:02 pm
Judge Oliver held a four-day hearing about the point, after which he wrote a 30-page opinion that carefully and thoughtfully explained why Italy was A.M.T.'s habitual residence. [read post]
27 May 2007, 6:47 pm
(Alternate link to opinion here.) [read post]
10 Jun 2008, 12:27 pm
Greenwood, 507 F.3d 416, (6th Cir. 2007) (click here for .pdf opinion). [read post]
9 Aug 2022, 11:46 pm
See also the Opinion of Advocate-General Szpunar. [read post]
1 Oct 2019, 6:58 am
Justice Kennedy wrote the lead opinion, joined by Justices French and Fischer. [read post]
6 Dec 2019, 10:16 am
Defending the 6th Circuit’s ruling, Taglieri tells the justices that the drafters of the Hague Convention intentionally declined to include a definition of “habitual residence. [read post]
23 May 2017, 7:16 am
” Because the opinion already has explained in its summary of the facts that Fourco “definitively and unambiguously held that” the reference to a “reside[nce]” in Section 1400(b) “refers only to the State of incorporation,” the clear-statement rule is all that is required to resolve the case. [read post]
5 Jun 2017, 10:46 am
Ultimately, the US Supreme Court in a unanimous Associate Justice Thomas opinion (Associate Justice Gorsuch not participating) decided to adopt the more restrictive definition: “resides” means where the defendant is incorporated. [read post]
7 Feb 2011, 1:07 pm
" -- Chief Justice Roberts delivered the opinion of the Court, joined by all other Justices except Justice Kagan, who took no part in the consideration or decision of the case. [read post]
26 Feb 2020, 6:57 am
This opinion resolved a circuit split over the definition of habitual residence. [read post]
26 Mar 2015, 7:55 am
The Court’s opinion was delivered by Justice Elena Kagan, and concurrences were filed by Justice Antonin Scalia and Justice Clarence Thomas. [read post]
10 Jan 2012, 3:57 pm
Aug. 8, 2011), an opinion by a three-judge District Court that upheld the ban on non-permanent-resident foreign citizens’ candidate campaign contributions and independent expenditures supporting or opposing candidates. [read post]
2 Apr 2012, 11:39 am
In an opinion joined by Justices Thomas and Alito, Justice Scalia dissented. [read post]
30 May 2017, 12:34 pm
The post Opinion analysis: Justices continue to apply ordinary modes of statutory interpretation to the U.S. immigration laws appeared first on SCOTUSblog. [read post]
17 Apr 2018, 3:38 pm
” states Justice Gorsuch in his concurring opinion in Sessions v. [read post]
17 Apr 2018, 3:38 pm
” states Justice Gorsuch in his concurring opinion in Sessions v. [read post]
