Search for: "Oregon & California R. Co. v. United States No. 2" Results 1 - 20 of 54
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Apr 2015, 1:00 am by Thaddeus Mason Pope, J.D., Ph.D.
Tucker served as lead counsel in both Glucksberg v Washington and Quill v NY, which raised federal constitutional claims seeking to establish the right; both cases were heard by the Supreme Court of the United States in the mid-1990s. [read post]
24 Aug 2017, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
Draper proposes that the voters of the state adopt a measure that would: (1) “[e]stablish new boundaries for three new states within the boundaries of the [current] State of California; (2) [e]stablish a procedure for the transformation of the single State of California into three new states; and (3) [p]rovide the legislative consent for the formation of three new states to Congress as required by the Constitution… [read post]
29 Jul 2008, 10:48 am
The court ordered briefing deferred pending the next decision of the United States Supreme Court in Philip Morris USA, Inc. v. [read post]
19 Aug 2016, 11:48 am by Whitney Roy
The United States District Court for the District of Oregon upheld a state law placing a temporary ban on the use of motorized equipment for mining in Oregon riverbeds and banks. [read post]
2 Jan 2014, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
As to interstate federalism, some states (and their representatives in DC) might be reluctant to reduce their current relative voice in the federal government, a consequence that would result from increasing California’s share in the Senate from 2% (two out of 100) to 11% (12 out of 110, because six states would mean 12 Senators under the federal Constitution’s command that the “Senate shall be composed of two Senators from each State. [read post]
19 Aug 2016, 11:48 am by Whitney Roy and Alison Kleaver
The United States District Court for the District of Oregon upheld a state law placing a temporary ban on the use of motorized equipment for mining in Oregon riverbeds and banks. [read post]
7 Apr 2013, 9:01 pm by David S. Kemp
Supreme Court’s decision in State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. v. [read post]
17 Jan 2013, 8:05 am by Marty Lederman
Perry (the challenge to California’s Proposition 8) and United States v. [read post]
3 Apr 2015, 8:59 am by WIMS
At MaumeeBayState Park in Oregon (Lucas Co.), Gov. [read post]
10 Nov 2009, 4:36 am by Larry Catá Backer
Governance has become a protean concept.2 The evolution of these relationships, and the reconstitution of public governance frameworks beyond the state, or, beyond the direct involvement of elected officials within the state, has generated significant academic interest and the development of a host of theoretical approaches to this phenomenon. [read post]
11 Dec 2012, 8:36 am by David Urban
Injunctions against Union Picketing: The California Supreme Court will soon issue a decision in the most significant free speech case on its docket, Ralphs Grocery Co. v. [read post]
4 Jun 2008, 2:46 pm
(in support of the petition) Brief amicus curiae of United States (recommending denial of certiorari) __________________ Docket: 07-512 Case name: Pacific Bell Telephone Co., dba AT&T California v. linkLine Communications Issue: Whether Section 2 of the Sherman Antitrust Act permits a "price squeeze" claim if the defendant has no duty to deal. [read post]