Search for: "Oregon Employment Law Letter" Results 21 - 40 of 292
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Oct 2017, 8:15 am by California Employment Law Letter
Yonahara, an editor of California Employment Law Letter and attorney with Freeland Cooper & Foreman LLP in San Francisco. [read post]
10 Mar 2010, 1:04 am
Jeff Merrick, Oregon Trial Attorney Injury & Employment Law 503-665-4234 The above is not legal advice. [read post]
16 Apr 2010, 7:26 am by HR Hero Alerts
Find more detailed information on this ruling in an upcoming issue of Oregon Employment Law Letter. [read post]
7 May 2009, 4:58 pm
Regular Division Rule Changes: OAR 137-055-2140 (Delegations to Administrative Law Judge): this change allows an administrative law judge (ALJ) to enter a final order by default on employment-related modifications. [read post]
13 Jun 2014, 5:30 am by Donna Ballman
Tell them to stop the one-sided criminalization of employment law. [read post]
5 Dec 2019, 6:38 am by Deb Givens
  The Federal Trade Commission continues to question the usefulness of CON laws, particularly in light of the nature of the laws limiting competitive entry. [read post]
Lisa Berg is a Shareholder at Stearns Weaver Miller Weissler Alhadeff & Sitterson, P.A. and an Editor for the Florida Employment Law Letter. [read post]
22 Aug 2023, 12:01 pm by Tim Zinnecker
Start Date: August 1, 2024 Lewis & Clark Law School in Portland, Oregon invites applications from candidates to teach as professors in our nationally ranked Lawyering Program beginning in the 2024-25 academic year. [read post]
22 Oct 2021, 2:15 am by Calvin L. Keith, Perkins Coie LLP
Keith is a partner with the law firm of Perkins Coie LLP in Portland, Oregon. [read post]
3 Feb 2011, 3:15 pm by almaraz
The program was held at Lewis & Clark Law School in Portland, Oregon on February 3, 2011. [read post]
15 Jul 2011, 4:30 pm
Jeff Merrick, Oregon Trial Attorney Injury & Employment Law 503-665-4234 [read post]
24 Jun 2015, 3:47 am by Joy Waltemath
Citing the private-employee whistleblower statute, ORS 659A.230, the employee argued that the public policy of Oregon encouraged his good-faith report of the defendant’s possession and display of child pornography and, consequently, that his actions fulfilled an important public duty protected by the common-law public-duty exception to at-will employment. [read post]
7 May 2019, 11:11 am by Jon L. Gelman
 For example, the Oregon Supreme Court refused to classify a worker as an employee for the purpose of workers’ compensation even though the employe was classified as employees for the purpose of state wage and hour laws. [read post]
2 Mar 2009, 9:44 pm
Officials promised not to reveal his behavior if potential employers called looking for references. [read post]
24 Mar 2017, 7:24 am by Joy Waltemath
Thus, the court found the university discriminated against the employee because of her marital status in violation of Oregon law. [read post]
11 Aug 2010, 10:30 pm
Jeff Merrick, Oregon Trial Attorney Injury & Employment Law 503-665-4234 [read post]