Search for: "Oregon Employment Law Letter" Results 41 - 60 of 202
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Sep 2019, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
Joyce’s attorneys sent a letter to the FEC in February that said Coleman embezzled from the campaign between 2015 through 2018. [read post]
23 Aug 2019, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
GovPredict, a government relations software company, found the frequency of lawmakers using four-letter words has increased steadily since 2014. [read post]
19 Aug 2019, 11:16 am by Laura I Appleman
With more than 80 percent of 2018 graduates employed in “gold standard” positions by March 2019, the College of Law has posted the top employment numbers in Oregon six out of the last seven years. [read post]
16 Aug 2019, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
The charge against Craig stems from his alleged public relations work, rather than lobbying, while with the law firm Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom. [read post]
More information about the new law will be provided in future issues of Oregon Employment Law Letter. [read post]
28 Jun 2019, 7:36 am by Epstein Becker & Green, P.C.
Clark In the last year, Maryland, Massachusetts, Oregon, and Washington State passed game-changing laws that restrict the enforceability of provisions between an employer and an employee that limit the employee’s post-termination ability to work in competition with the employer. [read post]
28 Jun 2019, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
The exchange, revealed in a series of letters, offers a new glimpse into an old relationship that erupted as a major controversy for Biden’s presidential campaign. [read post]
Lisa Berg is a Shareholder at Stearns Weaver Miller Weissler Alhadeff & Sitterson, P.A. and an Editor for the Florida Employment Law Letter. [read post]
11 Jun 2019, 11:17 am by John Elwood
Oregon Bureau of Labor and Industries, 18-547 Issues: (1) Whether Oregon violated the free speech and free exercise clauses of the First Amendment by compelling the Kleins to design and create a custom wedding cake to celebrate a same-sex wedding ritual in violation of their sincerely held religious beliefs; (2) whether the Supreme Court should overrule Employment Division, Department of Human Resources of Oregon v. [read post]
6 Jun 2019, 8:07 am by John Elwood
Oregon Bureau of Labor and Industries, 18-547 Issues: (1) Whether Oregon violated the free speech and free exercise clauses of the First Amendment by compelling the Kleins to design and create a custom wedding cake to celebrate a same-sex wedding ritual in violation of their sincerely held religious beliefs; (2) whether the Supreme Court should overrule Employment Division, Department of Human Resources of Oregon v. [read post]
30 May 2019, 8:11 am by John Elwood
Mesa, 17-1678, involving the liability of American law-enforcement officers who allegedly wrongfully shoot across the U.S. [read post]
29 May 2019, 11:23 am by Jonathan Direnfeld
Behrouzi for the next 20 years regardless of his place of employment (i.e. it follows him even if he leaves UrthBox). [read post]
23 May 2019, 7:12 am by John Elwood
Oregon Bureau of Labor and Industries, 18-547 Issues: (1) Whether Oregon violated the free speech and free exercise clauses of the First Amendment by compelling the Kleins to design and create a custom wedding cake to celebrate a same-sex wedding ritual in violation of their sincerely held religious beliefs; (2) whether the Supreme Court should overrule Employment Division, Department of Human Resources of Oregon v. [read post]
16 May 2019, 7:55 am by John Elwood
United States, 18-7187, which addresses whether law-enforcement officers may constitutionally insert a key they have seized into a locked apartment door to see whether it fits. [read post]
7 May 2019, 11:11 am by Jon L. Gelman
 For example, the Oregon Supreme Court refused to classify a worker as an employee for the purpose of workers’ compensation even though the employe was classified as employees for the purpose of state wage and hour laws. [read post]
6 May 2019, 12:05 pm by John Elwood
Oregon Bureau of Labor and Industries, 18-547 Issues: (1) Whether Oregon violated the free speech and free exercise clauses of the First Amendment by compelling the Kleins to design and create a custom wedding cake to celebrate a same-sex wedding ritual in violation of their sincerely held religious beliefs; (2) whether the Supreme Court should overrule Employment Division, Department of Human Resources of Oregon v. [read post]
6 May 2019, 6:00 am by Jon Rehm
For example, the Oregon Supreme Court refused to classify a worker as an employee for the purpose of workers’ compensation even though the employe was classified as employees for the purpose of state wage and hour laws. [read post]
24 Apr 2019, 2:23 pm by John Elwood
Oregon Bureau of Labor and Industries, 18-547 Issues: (1) Whether Oregon violated the free speech and free exercise clauses of the First Amendment by compelling the Kleins to design and create a custom wedding cake to celebrate a same-sex wedding ritual in violation of their sincerely held religious beliefs; (2) whether the Supreme Court should overrule Employment Division, Department of Human Resources of Oregon v. [read post]
18 Apr 2019, 2:42 pm by John Elwood
Barr, 18-725, involves a fairly arcane question of immigration law. [read post]
3 Apr 2019, 9:05 pm by Najah A. Farley
Oregon passed a law limiting non-competes to 18 months in duration, requiring notice and consideration beyond continued employment for some agreements. [read post]