Search for: "Oregon v. Branch"
Results 81 - 100
of 168
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Mar 2017, 8:46 am
On February 9, 2017, the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit declined to stay or narrow one such order pending the outcome of further judicial proceedings, while noting that the "political branches are far better equipped to make appropriate distinctions" about who should be covered by a suspension of entry or of refugee admissions. [read post]
3 Mar 2017, 5:14 pm
H.S.P. v. [read post]
17 Feb 2017, 6:56 am
Oregon C. [read post]
10 Feb 2017, 10:00 am
As the Supreme Court has stated in Larson v. [read post]
28 Dec 2016, 2:57 am
Washington Supreme Court: psychiatrist can be sued for failure to act when patient expressed homicidal thoughts, even though signs did not point to particular victim [Seattle Times, opinion in Volk v. [read post]
14 Nov 2016, 10:47 am
Windsor and Obergefell v. [read post]
21 Sep 2016, 10:12 am
Oregon). [read post]
19 Feb 2016, 11:57 am
Brown v. [read post]
18 Jan 2016, 4:08 am
Sweet Home Chapter, Communities for Great Oregon. [read post]
12 Nov 2014, 7:00 am
From my teaching post at the University of Oregon, I had written a book, To An Unknown God: Religious Freedom on Trial (2001), that was a history of one case. [read post]
5 Nov 2014, 9:27 am
At any rate, the burden is on the plaintiffs, under the Amnesty v. [read post]
20 Jul 2014, 3:00 am
The case is Ralls Corporation v. the Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States (an Executive Branch committee created by the Defense Production Act of 1950). [read post]
17 Jul 2014, 3:00 pm
Tuesday’s opinion in Ralls v. [read post]
15 Jul 2014, 10:34 am
The transaction quickly came under scrutiny from the Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States (CFIUS), an Executive Branch committee created by the Defense Production Act of 1950 (DPA), codified as amended at 50 U.S.C. app. [read post]
28 Jun 2014, 6:55 am
” On Tuesday, Wells highlighted opinions from the federal District of Oregon in United States v. [read post]
26 Jun 2014, 10:28 am
This week, a federal court in Oregon rebuffed him; the following post summarizes the most recent developments in United States v. [read post]
12 Jun 2014, 6:04 pm
§ 3582(c)), and even though the right to counsel applies to post-sentencing actions that affect time in custody (Mempa v. [read post]
12 May 2014, 7:47 am
Even if the Executive Branch ultimately wins in Zivitofksy v. [read post]
8 Apr 2014, 1:22 pm
(v) Decide issues involving the validity of a TSA regulation, order, or other requirement under the U.S. [read post]
29 Jan 2014, 1:36 pm
In 2008, the ACLU challenged the FAA on behalf of a coalition of human rights, media, labor, and legal organizations in Clapper v. [read post]
