Search for: "Oregon v. Branch"
Results 101 - 120
of 168
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Apr 2022, 6:27 am
On the side of the executive branch, he added he would like to see the Department of Justice commit to not prosecuting psychedelic-related offenses. [read post]
30 Jul 2013, 1:28 pm
According to the complaint in Ribot v Farmers Insurance Group, the CSRs had to arrive 15 minutes before their scheduled shift each day so they could boot up their computers, load programs, log on to the phone system, check email, and perform other essential work duties. [read post]
16 Nov 2007, 10:30 am
Bush centers on two American lawyers who were advising the Oregon branch of a Saudi-based Muslim charity. [read post]
28 Jul 2020, 6:58 am
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit in Oregon. [read post]
2 Jan 2024, 10:56 am
V; Marbury v. [read post]
8 Jan 2024, 5:42 pm
Garland and Garland v. [read post]
4 Dec 2019, 7:41 am
District Court for the District of Oregon issued a preliminary injunction against the operation of President Trump’s October immigration proclamation. [read post]
10 Mar 2024, 6:30 am
I also think that Congress has similar authority to address the problem in elections for state office, though I realize that this is a more contested view (including for reasons set out in Oregon v. [read post]
24 Sep 2019, 7:08 am
In his concurrence inTrump v. [read post]
14 Jul 2011, 1:30 pm
’” Citing State v. [read post]
17 Jul 2013, 4:47 pm
In this “narrow range of cases,” the sentencing court could examine court documents – the charging instrument and the jury instructions – to determine if the state conviction was for the branch of the relevant crime that matched the generic federal definition of the predicate offense for a “violent felony” under the ACCA. [read post]
16 Jan 2013, 10:42 am
For example, consider the Fifth Circuit decision from 2009, United States v. [read post]
15 Jul 2019, 4:54 am
Importantly, Chapter V of the GDPR authorizes only three methods for legal data transfers from the EEA to a third country, such as the United States: adequacy decisions, appropriate safeguards or limited enumerated exceptions (“derogations”). [read post]
25 Jul 2013, 7:03 am
Notwithstanding the fact that the named plaintiffs were not employed at all the branch facilities from which the putative class would be drawn, they met the typicality requirements of class certification, the court held. [read post]
1 Nov 2018, 4:35 pm
Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims held, in Haas v. [read post]
18 Jan 2016, 4:08 am
Sweet Home Chapter, Communities for Great Oregon. [read post]
9 Sep 2011, 8:43 am
Bank of Oregon v. [read post]
24 Jul 2018, 4:39 am
At the Penn Journal on Regulation’s Regulatory Review, Sarah Paoletti maintains that “[d]ue to th[is term’s] ruling [in Jennings v. [read post]
18 Feb 2013, 10:00 pm
Robert V. [read post]
[Eugene Volokh] Court Allows U.S. Prosecution for American's North Korea Speech About Cryptocurrency
28 Jan 2021, 3:09 pm
From U.S. v. [read post]