Search for: "Oregon v. Waterhouse"
Results 1 - 10
of 10
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Sep 2016, 9:23 am
Price Waterhouse v. [read post]
14 Nov 2016, 9:01 pm
” Plaintiffs victimized by sexual orientation discrimination have satisfied this requirement under two theories—sex stereotyping and same-sex sexual harassment—made possible by the Supreme Court.First, in Price Waterhouse v. [read post]
3 Apr 2019, 7:04 am
§ 2000e-2(a)(1), meant “gender identity” and included “transgender status” when Congress enacted Title VII in 1964; and (2) whether Price Waterhouse v. [read post]
22 Mar 2017, 8:36 am
Supreme Court opinion in Price Waterhouse v. [read post]
28 Nov 2023, 5:24 am
Sweet Home Chapter of Communities for a Great Oregon, 515 U.S. 687 (1995) Whole Woman’s Health v. [read post]
18 Apr 2019, 2:42 pm
Barton v. [read post]
1 Jul 2012, 5:52 pm
Resolved complaints include: Mrs Lorna Leckie v The Scottish Sun, Mr Andrew Curtis v The Sun, Dr Kalind Parashar v Daily Mail and Councillor James Moher v Brent & Kilburn Times. [read post]
26 Jun 2019, 1:05 pm
In Price-Waterhouse v. [read post]
9 Jan 2019, 2:48 pm
Oregon, the Supreme Court concluded that the Sixth Amendment required that juries convict by a unanimous vote, but concluded that this requirement does not apply to the states; accordingly, a state criminal defendant may lawfully be convicted based on (for example) a 9-3 vote. [read post]
2 Jan 2020, 10:49 am
Equal Employment Opportunity Commission) to determine “[w]hether Title VII prohibits discrimination against transgender people based on (1) their status as transgender or (2) sex stereotyping under Price Waterhouse v. [read post]
