Search for: "Orkin v. State" Results 1 - 20 of 36
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 May 2007, 11:27 am
Because theHolocaust Victims Redress Act, according to Judge Thomas, doesn't create a private right of action (which seems pretty right) and the plaintiffs' state law claims are time-barred (ditto).Art law. [read post]
4 Apr 2014, 4:00 am by Kimberly A. Kralowec
Orkin Services of California, Inc., 726 F.3d 1118 (9th Cir. 2013). [read post]
1 Jan 2012, 7:40 am
Saldukas, 896 So. 2d 707, 711 (Fla. 2005), but such agreements are subject to state law contract defenses such as unconscionability, Orkin Exterminating Co. v. [read post]
13 Jan 2016, 2:48 am by Heather Douglas
In Bergen & Associates Incorporated v. [read post]
13 Oct 2011, 1:55 pm by AALRR
AT& T Mobility LLC., the United States District Court for the Northern District of California agreed with the conclusion of the court in Quevedo v. [read post]