Search for: "Orr v. Orr" Results 41 - 60 of 249
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Jul 2020, 6:08 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Violations of disciplinary or ethical rules do not, by themselves, give rise to a cause of action (Sumo Container Sta. v Evans, Orr, Pacelli, Norton & Laffan, 278 AD2d 169, 170-171 [1st Dept 2000]; Lavanant v General Acc. [read post]
16 Jul 2020, 5:07 am by Dan Filler
Nominations will be reviewed by a prize committee consisting of Professors Seth Davis (Berkeley), Gillian Metzger (Columbia), James Pfander (Northwestern), and Carlos Vázquez (Georgetown). [read post]
1 May 2020, 3:17 am by Walter Olson
Illinois commission beats hasty retreat after gesture in that direction [Susanne Sclafane (presumption of compensability) and Stephanie Jones/Insurance Journal, Angela Childers/Business Insurance (vote to pull back from idea was unanimous) White House executive order declaring emergency federal authority over meatpacking industry might have been welcomed by companies hoping for override of liability over worker illness [Liz Crampton and Gabby Orr, Politico, NBC News] “The Case… [read post]
9 Oct 2019, 6:45 am by Mathew Purchase, Matrix Chambers
Royal Mail Group Ltd v Jhuti, heard 12 June 2019 and 13 June 2019. [read post]
29 Aug 2019, 2:39 pm by Peter Margulies
Receiving asylum is difficult, in part because of the requirement noted by the Supreme Court in INS v. [read post]
2 Aug 2019, 3:42 am
The first one, authored by Lionel Bently (University of Cambridge), discusses two decisions, one of which is the passing off case Johnston v Archibald Orr Ewing & Co (1882). [read post]
29 May 2019, 12:38 pm by Will Baude
Two great experts on the Supreme Court, Alli Orr Larsen and Jeffrey Fisher, have posted a draft of a new article, Virtual Briefing at the Supreme Court, which argues that there is a widespread practice of trying to influence the Supreme Court through the internet, and that this practice "is at least worth a serious pause. [read post]
29 Jan 2019, 9:08 am by John Elwood
United States, 17-6540, Orr v. [read post]
2 Nov 2018, 7:32 pm by Schachtman
Despite the inappropriateness of considering the Bazemore precedent after the Court decided Daubert, many lower court decisions have treated Bazemore as dispositive of reliability challenges to regression analyses, without any meaningful discussion.11 In the last several years, however, the appellate courts have awakened on occasion to their responsibilities to ensure that opinions of statistical expert witnesses, based upon regression analyses, are evaluated through the lens of Rule 702.12 1 Brock… [read post]
18 Jul 2018, 1:08 pm by Amy Howe
But last fall Kavanaugh provided at least a little insight into his views on Roe v. [read post]