Search for: "Ortiz v. United States" Results 1 - 20 of 229
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Apr 2021, 1:19 pm by John Elwood
United States, 20-559Issues: (1) Whether Feres v. [read post]
1 Apr 2021, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Addressing Plaintiffs' argument that their due process rights under the United States and New York State Constitutions as their property interests in promotion were adversely  affected as the result of the establishment of the two titles by the Department of Civil Service at DOCCS' request, the Appellate Division, citing Matter of Andriola v Ortiz, 82 NY2d 320, explained "a person successfully passing a competitive [c]ivil [s]ervice… [read post]
1 Apr 2021, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Addressing Plaintiffs' argument that their due process rights under the United States and New York State Constitutions as their property interests in promotion were adversely  affected as the result of the establishment of the two titles by the Department of Civil Service at DOCCS' request, the Appellate Division, citing Matter of Andriola v Ortiz, 82 NY2d 320, explained "a person successfully passing a competitive [c]ivil [s]ervice… [read post]
28 Oct 2020, 6:55 pm by Jacob Sapochnick
This lawsuit was brought by plaintiffs Leymis Carolina Velasquez and Sandra Ortiz – two beneficiaries of Temporary Protected Status who were denied adjustment of status due to their initial unlawful entry into the United States. [read post]
14 Sep 2020, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
” The third category of the statute thus prefers people who are 65 or older, giving them an entitlement to early voting by mail that younger persons do not enjoy unless they satisfy additional criteria.Plaintiffs challenged this law as violative of the Twenty-Sixth Amendment of the Constitution, which provides—also quite straightforwardly—that “[t]he right of citizens of the United States, who are eighteen years of age or older, to vote shall not be denied… [read post]
8 Jun 2020, 12:12 pm by Margo Schlanger
Both parties, and the United States as an amicus, agreed in this case that these provisions allow courts the ability to dismiss such suits without prejudice. [read post]
11 May 2020, 8:07 am by Dan Maurer
” To name a few: The report recommends ensuring the independence and professional protection of the “540F judge advocate” while sustaining the ability of the current convening authority to submit a statement outlining his or her considered opinion about how the crime and its prosecution affects discipline, efficiency, and morale; the report highlights the need for an independent “court administrative office,” like the U.K. uses, to manage arranging for the venue, timing… [read post]
19 Mar 2020, 1:13 pm by Will Baude
The Supreme Court recently held otherwise in Ortiz v. [read post]
28 Feb 2020, 4:03 am by Edith Roberts
At Top of the Ninth, Merle Kahn breaks down Tuesday’s oral argument in United States v. [read post]
26 Feb 2020, 3:50 am by Edith Roberts
Adam Liptak reports for The New York Times that during yesterday’s argument in United States v. [read post]
23 Feb 2020, 9:00 am by Kalvis Golde
The justices will then hear oral argument in United States v. [read post]