Search for: "Ortiz v. United States"
Results 141 - 160
of 322
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Sep 2008, 5:21 am
Ct. 2669; see also United States v. [read post]
7 May 2007, 1:12 am
United States, 458 F.3d 674, 677 (7th Cir.2006); Clark Equip. [read post]
12 May 2015, 6:15 am
Descarga el documento: United States v. [read post]
8 Dec 2011, 11:23 am
The appeal in the First Circuit's recent opinion in United States v. [read post]
8 Jun 2020, 12:12 pm
Both parties, and the United States as an amicus, agreed in this case that these provisions allow courts the ability to dismiss such suits without prejudice. [read post]
1 Nov 2010, 5:26 am
JORDAN, PAULA, ET AL. 09-846 UNITED STATES v. [read post]
14 Sep 2013, 11:28 am
Napue v People of State of Illinois, 360 US 264; Pyle v State of Kansas, 317 US 213; cf. [read post]
6 Sep 2012, 11:00 am
Ortiz on September 6, 2012 · Posted in Jurisdiction,Stern Files COURTESY OF WEIL GOTSHAL & MANGES Bankruptcy Blog The Advisory Committee on Bankruptcy Rules for the Judicial Conference of the United States has proposed amendments to Bankruptcy Rules 7008, 7012, 7016, 9027, and 9033 in an attempt to address some of the inefficiencies that the Supreme Court’s Stern v. [read post]
13 Dec 2023, 9:09 am
Ortiz, and United States v. [read post]
15 Dec 2009, 10:14 am
United States v. [read post]
29 May 2023, 12:00 pm
United States, where Justice Jackson was the only member of the Court to join Justice Gorsuch’s majority opinion in full; and Andy Warhol Foundation for Visual Arts, Inc. v. [read post]
1 Dec 2006, 12:16 pm
United States v. [read post]
7 Sep 2007, 11:26 am
United States v. [read post]
9 Jul 2021, 1:20 pm
In Ortiz-Diaz v. [read post]
17 Jan 2019, 6:00 am
” He suggests that the Supreme Court’s decision in the recent case of Ortiz v. [read post]
11 Jul 2011, 11:52 am
On June 20, 2011, the United States Supreme Court decided Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. [read post]
13 Dec 2023, 10:14 am
See United States v. [read post]
7 Jun 2008, 6:38 pm
As the federal courts have observed, a defendant has no reasonable expectation of privacy in the publicly accessible exterior of his or her vehicle, and the undercarriage is part of the vehicle's exterior (see New York v Class, 475 U.S. 106, 112-114 [1986]; United States v Rascon-Ortiz, 994 F2d 749, 754 [10th Cir 1993]; see also People v Jackson, 143 AD2d 471, 472 [1988]). [read post]
14 Jun 2007, 11:26 pm
United States, 458 F.3d 674, 677 (7th Cir.2006); Clark Equip. [read post]
30 Oct 2010, 9:00 am
Jordan (09-737) and United States v. [read post]
