Search for: "Osorio v. State Farm Bank, F.S.B." Results 1 - 8 of 8
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Aug 2017, 11:30 am by Hunton & Williams LLP
State Farm Bank F.S.B., 746 F.3d 1242 (11th Cir. 2014), the Second Circuit held that bargained-for written consent cannot be unilaterally withdrawn by a consumer. [read post]
2 Aug 2017, 11:30 am by Hunton & Williams LLP
State Farm Bank F.S.B., 746 F.3d 1242 (11th Cir. 2014), the Second Circuit held that bargained-for written consent cannot be unilaterally withdrawn by a consumer. [read post]
19 Nov 2014, 3:59 am
State Farm Bank, F.S.B., 746 F.3d 1242, 1255-56 (11th Cir. 2014); Gager v. [read post]
7 May 2018, 10:22 am by Jonathan Hoffmann
State Farm Bank, F.S.B., the Eleventh Circuit stated that the plaintiffs in that case, “in the absence of any contractual restriction to the contrary, were free to orally revoke any consent previously given . . . . [read post]
State Farm Bank, F.S.B., which held that a consumer could orally revoke consent to receive automated calls and a 2015 FCC Declaratory Ruling that concluded that “prior express consent” is revocable under the TCPA. [read post]
2 Dec 2014, 5:52 am
State Farm Bank, F.S.B., 746 F.3d 1242, 1251-52 (11th Cir. 2014), rejecting the argument the "intended recipient" is the "called party" for purpose of § 227 and explaining a "called party" means "the subscriber to the cell phone service. [read post]