Search for: "Owen v. Owen" Results 1 - 20 of 1,709
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Jul 2018, 2:44 am
In light of Mr Owens’ defence, the recorder granted Mrs Owens permission to amend her petition so as to expand her allegations of behaviour. [read post]
28 May 2015, 6:37 am by Daily Record Staff
Theolinda Lyons-Owens, Lyons-Owens, was terminated from her position as Equal Employment Opportunity Manager of the Maryland Aviation Administration (“the Administration”). [read post]
12 Oct 2017, 3:44 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
Final Written Decision, Owens Corning v. [read post]
7 Mar 2013, 7:25 pm by landuseprof
Dave Owen (Maine) has posted Taking Groundwater. [read post]
15 Feb 2013, 5:45 am by propertyprof
Dave Owen (Maine) has posted Taking Groundwater on SSRN. [read post]
12 Mar 2010, 3:16 am by traceydennis
Noble v Owens [2010] EWCA Civ 224; [2010] WLR (D) 73  ”Where fresh evidence was adduced in the Court of Appeal tending to show that the judge at first instance had been deliberately misled the court would only allow the appeal and order a retrial where the fraud was either admitted or the evidence of it was incontrovertible. [read post]
11 Sep 2020, 1:35 am
Author Ham - Licence CC BY-SA 3.0, Source Wikipedia  Jane Lambert Court of Appeal (Lords Justices David Richards, Newey and Arnold) TBD (Owen Holland) Ltd v Simons and others [2020] EWCA Civ 1182 (8 Sept 2020) This was a judgment on two appeals. [read post]
13 May 2010, 2:31 am by traceydennis
Noble v Owens Court of Appeal “Where the Court of Appeal received fresh evidence alleging that the judge below had been deliberately misled, the court would order a retrial only where the fraud was either admitted or the evidence of it was incontrovertible. [read post]
4 Jun 2010, 1:46 am by sally
Richard Buxton (a Firm) v Mills-Owens Court of Appeal “Since solicitors were under a professional duty not to advance arguments which they did not consider to be properly arguable, where a client insisted on such argument being advanced, a solicitor was lawfully entitled to terminate his retainer. [read post]
6 Dec 2021, 6:19 am by Unreported Opinions
The post OWENS LANDING COUNCIL OF UNIT OWNERS INC., ET AL. v. 12 RIVER, LLC, ET AL  first appeared on Maryland Daily Record. [read post]
11 Jul 2016, 7:29 am by Daily Record Staff
Owens, appellant, was found guilty of first and second-degree assault, reckless endangerment, and carrying a dangerous weapon openly with the intent to injure. [read post]
25 Feb 2010, 2:56 am by sally
Richard Buxton (a firm) v Mills-Owen (Law Society intervening) [2010] EWCA Civ 122; [2010] WLR (D) 49 “It was wrong to restrict the circumstances in which a solicitor might lawfully terminate his retainer to those in which he was instructed to do something improper. [read post]
25 Jul 2018, 2:51 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
The Supreme Court unanimously dismissed the appeal, with the result that Mrs Owens must remain married to Mr Owens for the time being. [read post]
4 Apr 2011, 2:39 am by sally
Owens v Dudley Metropolitan Borough Council [2011] EWCA Civ 359; [2011] WLR (D) 120 “Where the pension entitlement of an employee seeking a teachers’ pension was being determined and the term ‘teacher’ had not been defined by the legislature the word was to be construed in accordance with its natural meaning. [read post]
22 Jun 2009, 1:42 am
Owens v City of Westminster Magistrates' Court [2009] EWHC 1343 (Admin); [2009] WLR (D) 20 “When an appeal to the High Court under s 26 of the Extradition Act 2003 against an order for extradition to a category 1 territory was unsuccessful, the decision of the High Court on the appeal did not become final within [...] [read post]
22 Jan 2020, 12:41 am
Author Mohammed Tawsif Salam Licence CC BY-SA 3.0  Source Wikipedia Chancery Divison (Mr Justice Marcus Smith) TBD (Owen Holland) Ltd v Simons and others [2020] EWHC 30 (Ch) (17 Jan 2020) Jane Lambert In Anton Piller KG v Manufacturing Processes Ltd. and others [1976] Ch 55, [1975] EWCA Civ 12, [1976] 1 All ER 779, Lord Denning MR noted that the judges of the Chancery Division [read post]