Search for: "Owens v. Chance" Results 41 - 60 of 101
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Mar 2010, 8:43 am by Steve Hall
Skinner's case and ultimately allow him the chance to prove his innocence through DNA testing. [read post]
25 May 2010, 8:11 am by Steve Hall
The material was never tested because other DNA evidence that was tested had helped to implicate Skinner, and his original trial attorney did not want to take the chance that more testing would do the same. [read post]
8 Apr 2009, 3:22 am
If Benesch is questionable, the result in Owens v. [read post]
28 Jan 2013, 11:46 am by Schachtman
Rapid Transit, 317 Mass. 469, 470, 58 N.E.2d 754, 755 (1945) (evidence that defendant was the only bus franchise operating in the area where the accident took place was not sufficient to establish that the bus that caused the accident belonged to the defendant where private or chartered buses could have been in the area; it is not enough that mathematically the chances somewhat favor the proposition to be proved) Kamosky v Owens-Illinois Co., 89 F. [read post]
16 Mar 2011, 9:15 am by Schachtman
(holding that plaintiffs had failed to prove that their cancers were caused by radiation exposures, on the basis of their statistical, epidemiological proofs), aff’d, 339 F.2d 605, (6th Cir. 1964)(per curiam) Kamosky v Owens-Illinois Co., 89 F. [read post]
12 Jan 2010, 12:06 pm by Andrew Koppelman
Bush's judicial nominees, such as Miguel Estrada and Priscilla Owen. [read post]
22 Dec 2014, 1:48 am by Jeremy Speres
  In Lucky Star Ltd v Lucky Brands (Pty) Ltd and others, Judge Owen Rogers, of the High Court at the foot of a mountain, deftly dealt with a claim of primary trade mark infringement, as well as dilution, of the applicant’s iconic LUCKY STAR word as well as device marks registered in respect of, amongst others, fish products, fresh salads and retail services. [read post]
9 Nov 2015, 7:09 am
Hogner, 694 N.W.2d 296, 304 (Wis. 2005) (emphasis added).So, in order for an argument against punitive damages based on the low incidence of the particular risk involved to have a good chance of prevailing, the jurisdiction would have to make this consideration an element (or at least a factor) in its legal standard for the award of punitive damages. [read post]