Search for: "Owings v. Speed" Results 261 - 280 of 326
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Sep 2017, 10:26 pm by Wolfgang Demino
 In the default judgment context, the NCO/TSI robo-affidavit mostly served to establish the amount claimed as owing on the loans as "liquidated damages". [read post]
7 Apr 2021, 4:13 pm by Apsosredesign
  1532: During the reign of Holy Roman Emperor Charles V, law passed stating the opinion of medical men must be formally given in the cases of violent death. [read post]
9 May 2020, 7:09 am by J
Cancelling rent arrears owed to local authorities will play havoc with the Housing Revenue Account. [read post]
15 Nov 2010, 11:40 pm by Ben Reeve-Lewis
This was set out in the case of Hillingdon v Tinn, where the judge held that the property for Mrs Tinn was too expensive and the council should treat her as homeless on that basis. [read post]
22 May 2017, 1:01 am by rhapsodyinbooks
He had all the strength, speed and coordination of the finest players, plus an incredible stamina. [read post]
11 Nov 2020, 1:07 pm by Schwartzapfel Lawyers P.C.
One of the most recent and well-known cases in the United States would be Commonwealth v. [read post]
9 Feb 2021, 11:29 am by Laura Hyne
The total damages owed are usually then deducted from the purchase price. [read post]
15 Nov 2022, 8:47 am by Jennifer González
Disheartened by this delay, he sought to use his background to speed up communications. [read post]
29 Apr 2020, 10:40 am by Kevin
By 2011, it was apparent he was going to owe a lot of money in taxes. [read post]
10 Sep 2016, 11:14 am by Rebecca Tushnet
  High-backed vowels like “e” in flea connote smaller/less power than “ow” or “oo” throughout cultures. [read post]
12 Apr 2015, 2:05 pm by Stephen Bilkis
The Husband created a danger to the children by speeding off with Roberta and Sofia in the car. [read post]
  Most recently of all, in Nicklinson (Nicklinson and Lamb v the United Kingdom), the ECtH [read post]
7 Jul 2021, 9:52 am by Phil Dixon
Judges Inman and Griffin concurred. (1) Victim’s statements regarding identity of attacker were admissible as excited utterances despite possible passage of time between attack and statements; (2) Sixth Amendment confrontation argument not raised during trial was waived on appeal notwithstanding pretrial motion; (3) No abuse of discretion or prejudicial error in admission of testimony identifying defendant on a jail phone call and interpreting the contents of the call State v. [read post]
17 Aug 2009, 4:20 am
  Judge Elizabeth Magner, in McCain v Ocwen, ______________, stated that the evidence adduced i [read post]