Search for: "P. v. Heard"
Results 61 - 80
of 2,196
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Apr 2009, 8:06 am
The Fifth Circuit heard arguments yesterday on Halliburton’s appeal of Jamie Leigh Jones v. [read post]
7 May 2010, 7:49 am
Supreme Court heard argument in Rent-A-Center v. [read post]
1 Apr 2011, 9:22 am
In Wyeth v. [read post]
26 Apr 2020, 12:16 am
P’ship v. [read post]
21 Oct 2013, 12:28 am
In Courtroom 1 from Monday 21 until Wednesday 23 October 2013 are the linked appeals of P (by his litigation friend the Official Solicitor) v Cheshire West and Chester Council, and P & Anor (by their litigation friend, the Official Solicitor) v Surrey County Council. [read post]
11 May 2009, 3:04 pm
Probate litigator Stephen P. [read post]
9 Nov 2016, 11:19 am
But if the prosecution does refile such charges, Penal Code section 1538.5, subdivision (p) provides that any suppression motion the defendant subsequently files must be heard by the ―same judge‖ who granted the prior motion so long as that judge is 'available.' The question before us is whether trial courts are vested with discretion to decide whether a judge is available under section 1538.5(p), and if so, what limitations constrain that… [read post]
22 Dec 2010, 7:31 am
In Nuci Phillips Memorial Foundation v. [read post]
3 May 2022, 6:44 pm
The Fourth Circuit heard oral argument in Cawthorn v. [read post]
15 Oct 2022, 11:03 am
Description: Last week, the Supreme Court heard oral arguments in Merrill v. [read post]
29 Nov 2010, 2:16 pm
Today the US Supreme Court heard argument in Walker v. [read post]
12 Mar 2012, 5:19 am
From Tuesday 13 March until Wednesday 14 March 2012 is the Privy Council hearing of The Queen ex p Mario Hoffmann v The Commissioner for the Turks & Caicos Islands Commission of Inquiry (2008-2009) and The Governor of the Turks & Caicos Islands, to be heard by Lords Phillips, Brown, Mance, Kerr and Dyson. [read post]
9 Dec 2011, 7:01 am
McCarthy, No. 140306, and McCarthy v. [read post]
13 Oct 2010, 11:47 am
Supreme Court heard Bruesewitz v. [read post]
7 Nov 2007, 2:19 am
-->_qacct="p-a5YZ00fCRWn7o";quantserve(); [read post]
1 Feb 2012, 2:22 am
The court in McDonald wondered whether they should have been invited to return to the source of the problem, which is R v Gloucestershire CC ex p Barry [1997] AC 584. [read post]
1 Jul 2010, 11:20 am
Feld Entertainment, Inc. was heard in the United States District Court for the District of Columbia. [read post]
9 Dec 2014, 3:43 am
Yesterday the Court heard oral arguments in Department of Transportation v. [read post]
8 Apr 2019, 11:11 pm
The case was heard En banc, which means that it was heard by all of the 1st DCA judges rather than by a panel of three judges. [read post]
