Search for: "P. v. Leeds" Results 1 - 20 of 39
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Jun 2010, 5:37 am by Douglas Reiser
The USGBC Response It appears that USGBC V-P, Brendan Owens, and USGBC General Counsel, Susan Dorn, have made public statements supporting the USGBC’s decision to dismiss the challenge and uphold gold certification. [read post]
7 Dec 2016, 2:41 pm by Giles Peaker
Leeds City Council v Broadley [2016] EWCA Civ 1213 This was Leeds’ second appeal of a Valuation Tribunal decision on council tax liability. [read post]
17 Jul 2009, 9:55 am
:p [This is a perfect example of the green building performance gap. [read post]
24 Feb 2011, 3:02 pm by chief
Hounslow v Powell; Leeds v Hall; Birmingham v Frisby [2011] UKSC 8 [This is probably a work in progress. [read post]
24 Feb 2011, 3:02 pm by chief
Hounslow v Powell; Leeds v Hall; Birmingham v Frisby [2011] UKSC 8 [This is probably a work in progress. [read post]
27 Apr 2015, 4:09 pm by INFORRM
  In addition to the public right not to be misled, the courts have also employed the nebulous concepts of role model status and press freedom to criticise to justify interferences with privacy (for further discussion see P. [read post]
22 Jan 2023, 4:35 pm by INFORRM
Accredited journalists and legal bloggers will be allowed to report certain cases, including court and placement applications, starting from 30 January 2023 in Leeds, Carlisle and Cardiff. [read post]
3 May 2018, 8:10 am by Dave
  I had the Court of Appeal’s decision about capacity to make a homelessness application in mind: WB v W District Council [2018] EWCA Civ 928. [read post]
24 Sep 2009, 5:09 am
Leeds & Northrup Co., 912 F. [read post]
28 Sep 2009, 1:31 am
Leeds & Northrup Co., 912 F. [read post]
28 Sep 2009, 1:31 am
Leeds & Northrup Co., 912 F. [read post]
28 Sep 2009, 1:31 am
Leeds & Northrup Co., 912 F. [read post]
27 Oct 2018, 7:52 am by INFORRM
The first is to interpret the concept of freedom of speech according to its origins, which was, as Lord Browne-Wilkinson put it in Pepper v Hart ‘to discuss what they [Parliament], as opposed to the monarch, chose to have discussed’ (p 638). [read post]
20 May 2010, 9:42 pm by Simon Gibbs
Both sides were represented by experienced specialist costs counsel (Mr Andrew Post and Mr Simon P Browne). [read post]
28 Jul 2011, 3:41 am by Rosalind English
 On 16 June 2011, in Leeds Crown Court Paul Maxwell pleaded guilty. [read post]