Search for: "PARKER v. NO DEFENDANT LISTED"
Results 101 - 120
of 184
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Jun 2015, 4:13 pm
On the same day Kenneth Parker J will hear applications in the case of Decoulos v Axel Springer Schweiz AG and Andrews J will ha [read post]
19 Jun 2015, 10:28 am
The Copyright Board is surely a much smaller ship to turn if course correction is needed, as many from all viewpoints now believe to be the case.These developments are very promising and set the stage for the implementation of much needed regulations to ensure that the Board gets back and stay on course with the original vision from Judge Parker in 1935. [read post]
22 Apr 2015, 6:55 am
HAVENNER, Appellant, v. [read post]
30 Jan 2015, 11:00 am
PARKER AND CITY OF HOUSTON, No. 13-0047 Set to be argued on February 24, 2015 Previously: Two opinions, one rehearing grant, and six grants (March 23, 2014) PLAINS EXPLORATION & PRODUCTION COMPANY v. [read post]
5 Jan 2015, 6:42 am
Parker, 295 Conn. 825, 992 A.2d 1103 (2010). [read post]
30 Dec 2014, 9:24 am
The SKAPP website lists those who guided and supported SKAPP’s attempts to subvert expert witness validity requirements; not surprisingly, the SKAPP supporters were mostly plaintiffs’ expert witnesses: Eula Bingham, PhDLes Boden, PhDRichard Clapp, DSc, MPHPolly Hoppin, ScDSheldon Krimsky, PhDDavid Michaels, PhD, MPHDavid Ozonoff, MD, MPHAnthony Robbins, MD, MPA [2] See, e.g., Parker v. [read post]
19 Dec 2014, 3:08 am
McNeely, Melendez-Diaz v. [read post]
23 Nov 2014, 4:06 pm
The trial is listed for 5 days. [read post]
25 May 2014, 11:08 am
The defendant relies on the rulings of District of Columbia v Heller and McDonald V City of Chicago. [read post]
15 Mar 2014, 6:55 am
Most Parker County attorneys who handle insurance claims know that there is not a claim for "negligent claim handling," that the claim that probably exists has to fall under one of those listed in the Texas Insurance Code. [read post]
6 Mar 2014, 9:00 am
The court of appeals in Parker v. [read post]
2 Oct 2013, 2:26 pm
Parker v. [read post]
10 Jul 2013, 1:32 pm
They cited to notices that they sent to carriers, but the court says these 150 page long lists of titles are insufficient to impart actual knowledge. [read post]
20 Sep 2012, 8:45 am
Parker v. [read post]
11 Sep 2012, 8:26 am
Personal names privilege: defendant has a privilege to use his/her own surname, which around 1900 was absolute. [read post]
4 Sep 2012, 10:07 am
In Parker v. [read post]
4 Jun 2012, 7:53 pm
Evans v. [read post]
31 May 2012, 12:43 pm
Dukes involving the standard for class-action certification, and a fourth time in Parker v. [read post]
29 May 2012, 9:40 am
Washington, that prejudice requires a showing that, but for counsel’s error, there is a reasonable probability of a different outcome.Certiorari stage documents:Opinion below (6th Cir.)Petition for certiorari Brief in oppositionReply of petitioner Parker v. [read post]
29 May 2012, 1:21 am
Citing its own February 2010 opinion in Litwin v. [read post]
