Search for: "PARKER v. NO DEFENDANT LISTED"
Results 101 - 120
of 206
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Nov 2015, 2:49 am
Rather, a defendant must aim “to permanently deprive the victim[] of the property” (People v Medina, 18 NY3d 98, 105 [2011]; see People v Jennings, 69 NY2d at 118; People v Jacobs, 52 AD3d 432, 433 [2008], lv denied 11 NY3d 833 [2008]; see also People v Parker, 121 AD3d 1190, 1191 [2014]). [read post]
9 Nov 2015, 7:09 am
As for the rest, here’s a list of those with punitive damages formulations that provide support for a limit on such damages based on statistical likelihood of risk. [read post]
29 Oct 2015, 5:30 pm
This is despite the high threshold for injurious falsehood claims, requiring a plaintiff to prove all of the following elements; a false statement about the plaintiff’s goods or business (falsity); publication of the statement by the defendant to a third party; malice; and actual damage (Palmer Bruyn & Parker Pty Ltd v Parsons (2001) 208 CLR 388 [52]). [read post]
7 Oct 2015, 4:46 pm
Ohio 2005) (finding that defendant company’s production of the audit committee’s PowerPoint presentation of investigation to plaintiff shareholders resulted in full subject matter waiver of the attorney-client privilege); Gruss v. [read post]
27 Jul 2015, 8:53 am
Practical Approaches to Defending Class Actions: John Parker Sweeney pointed out how Wal-Mart v. [read post]
20 Jul 2015, 9:34 am
” In Glatt v. [read post]
28 Jun 2015, 4:13 pm
On the same day Kenneth Parker J will hear applications in the case of Decoulos v Axel Springer Schweiz AG and Andrews J will ha [read post]
19 Jun 2015, 10:28 am
The Copyright Board is surely a much smaller ship to turn if course correction is needed, as many from all viewpoints now believe to be the case.These developments are very promising and set the stage for the implementation of much needed regulations to ensure that the Board gets back and stay on course with the original vision from Judge Parker in 1935. [read post]
14 Jun 2015, 2:20 pm
Toth v. [read post]
22 Apr 2015, 6:55 am
HAVENNER, Appellant, v. [read post]
30 Jan 2015, 11:00 am
PARKER AND CITY OF HOUSTON, No. 13-0047 Set to be argued on February 24, 2015 Previously: Two opinions, one rehearing grant, and six grants (March 23, 2014) PLAINS EXPLORATION & PRODUCTION COMPANY v. [read post]
30 Jan 2015, 11:00 am
PARKER AND CITY OF HOUSTON, No. 13-0047 Set to be argued on February 24, 2015 Previously: Two opinions, one rehearing grant, and six grants (March 23, 2014) PLAINS EXPLORATION & PRODUCTION COMPANY v. [read post]
5 Jan 2015, 6:42 am
Parker, 295 Conn. 825, 992 A.2d 1103 (2010). [read post]
30 Dec 2014, 9:24 am
The SKAPP website lists those who guided and supported SKAPP’s attempts to subvert expert witness validity requirements; not surprisingly, the SKAPP supporters were mostly plaintiffs’ expert witnesses: Eula Bingham, PhDLes Boden, PhDRichard Clapp, DSc, MPHPolly Hoppin, ScDSheldon Krimsky, PhDDavid Michaels, PhD, MPHDavid Ozonoff, MD, MPHAnthony Robbins, MD, MPA [2] See, e.g., Parker v. [read post]
19 Dec 2014, 3:08 am
McNeely, Melendez-Diaz v. [read post]
23 Nov 2014, 4:06 pm
The trial is listed for 5 days. [read post]
20 Nov 2014, 2:21 pm
Washington Square v. [read post]
26 Jul 2014, 9:25 am
These summaries are based on the issues listed in the briefs filed and may not very accurately or fully describe the actual issues in the cases. [read post]
25 May 2014, 11:08 am
The defendant relies on the rulings of District of Columbia v Heller and McDonald V City of Chicago. [read post]
15 Mar 2014, 6:55 am
Most Parker County attorneys who handle insurance claims know that there is not a claim for "negligent claim handling," that the claim that probably exists has to fall under one of those listed in the Texas Insurance Code. [read post]
