Search for: "PARKER v. UNITED STATES"
Results 241 - 260
of 827
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Sep 2020, 4:11 pm
Law students are on edge during final exams during normal times, but as the United States became overwhelmed by the COVID-19 pandemic, universities sent students, faculty, and staff home to finish the semester online and were left with a myriad of issues to address. [read post]
17 Jan 2022, 10:17 am
The anti-patent-right-expansion policy of Deepsouth was repeated in Parker v. [read post]
1 Jul 2021, 10:05 pm
According to an article by David Lieb of the Associated Press, in the United States, only New York, Louisiana, and California have such apps right now. [read post]
22 Apr 2024, 5:49 am
From Judge Linda Parker's opinion Thursday in U.S. v. [read post]
11 Jun 2019, 3:51 am
In Parker Drilling Management Services. [read post]
10 Sep 2020, 10:32 am
In United States v. [read post]
25 Mar 2020, 3:41 pm
When the HHS Secretary has declared a public health emergency and the President of the United States has declared a disaster or emergency under the Stafford Act or National Emergencies Act, the HHS Secretary is authorized to grant certain waivers or modifications in order to address the outbreak (referred to as a Section 1135 Waiver). [read post]
18 May 2021, 12:54 pm
The hawala operation took drug proceeds from Canada to the United States and then to the Mexican cartels. [read post]
16 Apr 2015, 3:55 pm
Parker,1 the Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS) decided that “public use” could be interpreted as for a “public purpose. [read post]
26 Feb 2011, 8:23 am
(internal quotation marks omitted)); Parker v. [read post]
25 May 2021, 6:27 am
Background In 2015, The United States Environmental Protection Agency issued a notice of violation alleging that certain Volkswagen vehicles had been fitted with a device which could detect when that vehicle was being tested for emissions compliance and could manipulate the results. [read post]
Jail suicide following alleged false arrest and striking with baton was not a Fourth Amendment claim
29 Mar 2007, 7:25 pm
United States v. [read post]
14 Mar 2012, 8:52 am
Weinfeld of Parker, Milliken, Clark, O’Hara & Samuelian in Los Angeles. [read post]
3 Apr 2014, 8:27 am
(d/b/a CHEAPTICKETS.COM) v. [read post]
7 Mar 2011, 7:44 am
CaldwellDocket: 10-622Issue(s): (1) Whether a binding agreement among multiple states and private companies is immunized from antitrust scrutiny under the state-action immunity doctrine of Parker v. [read post]
17 May 2017, 10:04 am
In D.C. v. [read post]
27 Oct 2010, 12:03 pm
See Kelo, 545 U.S. at 521 (Thomas, J., dissenting) (citing United States v. [read post]
18 Jun 2009, 10:04 pm
Court of Appeals for the 2d Circuit issued an order denying rehearing en banc in United States v. [read post]
22 Aug 2012, 8:01 am
The current economic situation in the United States is recognized on all sides to be grim, and not getting better any time soon. [read post]
28 May 2018, 1:42 pm
Parker, 651 S.W.2d 338, 339 (Tex. [read post]
