Search for: "PARKER v. UNITED STATES" Results 241 - 260 of 830
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Oct 2011, 5:00 am by Kimberly A. Kralowec
Susan Illston, Judge, United States District Court, Northern District of California Aton Arbisser, Kaye Scholer LLP Elizabeth J. [read post]
9 Sep 2020, 4:11 pm by Sabrina I. Pacifici
Law students are on edge during final exams during normal times, but as the United States became overwhelmed by the COVID-19 pandemic, universities sent students, faculty, and staff home to finish the semester online and were left with a myriad of issues to address. [read post]
17 Jan 2022, 10:17 am by Dennis Crouch
The anti-patent-right-expansion policy of Deepsouth was repeated in Parker v. [read post]
1 Jul 2021, 10:05 pm by Jeff Richardson
  According to an article by David Lieb of the Associated Press, in the United States, only New York, Louisiana, and California have such apps right now. [read post]
11 Jun 2019, 3:51 am by Edith Roberts
In Parker Drilling Management Services. [read post]
25 Mar 2020, 3:41 pm by admin
When the HHS Secretary has declared a public health emergency and the President of the United States has declared a disaster or emergency under the Stafford Act or National Emergencies Act, the HHS Secretary is authorized to grant certain waivers or modifications in order to address the outbreak (referred to as a Section 1135 Waiver). [read post]
16 Apr 2015, 3:55 pm
Parker,1 the Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS) decided that “public use” could be interpreted as for a “public purpose. [read post]
18 May 2021, 12:54 pm by Jon Sands
The hawala operation took drug proceeds from Canada to the United States and then to the Mexican cartels. [read post]
25 May 2021, 6:27 am by CMS
Background In 2015, The United States Environmental Protection Agency issued a notice of violation alleging that certain Volkswagen vehicles had been fitted with a device which could detect when that vehicle was being tested for emissions compliance and could manipulate the results. [read post]
7 Mar 2011, 7:44 am by Kali Borkoski
CaldwellDocket: 10-622Issue(s): (1) Whether a binding agreement among multiple states and private companies is immunized from antitrust scrutiny under the state-action immunity doctrine of Parker v. [read post]