Search for: "PARKER v. UNITED STATES" Results 321 - 340 of 813
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Jan 2021, 3:40 pm by Robert Liles
  Case Example Where the Government Sought to Pierce the Corporate Veil of a Home Health Agency: In United States v. [read post]
17 Aug 2012, 6:34 am by Richard A. Epstein
  From this caldron emerged the famous Footnote 4 in the 1938 case of United States v. [read post]
15 Dec 2020, 11:51 am by Bona Law PC
Brief of the United States and the Federal Trade Commission as Amici Curiae Supporting Plaintiffs-Appellee SmileDirectClub, LLC v. [read post]
15 May 2015, 1:37 pm by Mary Jane Wilmoth
KokeshCase Number: 09-cv-01021 (United States District Court for the District of New Mexico)Case Filed: October 27, 2009Qualifying Judgment/Order: March 30, 2015 4/30/15 7/29/15 2015-39 SEC v. [read post]
17 Jul 2015, 10:17 am by Mary Jane Wilmoth
KokeshCase Number: 09-cv-01021 (United States District Court for the District of New Mexico)Case Filed: October 27, 2009Qualifying Judgment/Order: March 30, 2015 4/30/15 7/29/15 2015-39 SEC v. [read post]
4 May 2016, 8:07 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
Benefiting from an intervening Supreme Court ruling decided in 2015, Young v. [read post]
11 Feb 2012, 7:32 am by Mark S. Humphreys
The United States District Court, Southern District, Houston Division, issued an opinion on December 20, 2011, that dealt with the interpretation of a commercial insurance policy. [read post]
11 Apr 2011, 10:00 pm by Rosalind English
See paras 23 – 29 of  R (English UK Ltd) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2010] EWHC 1726   for a further explanation of the workings of PBS. [read post]
16 May 2014, 2:16 pm by Jani
With the Alice Corporation v CLS Bank Supreme Court decision looming in the horizon, and the patentability of software in the US faces its most recent judicial challenge, this writer thought it was best to look at the origins of the current stance of such patents in the United States. [read post]
17 Apr 2012, 6:02 am by Mark S. Humphreys
This is a case decided by the United States Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals in 2007. [read post]