Search for: "PARKER v. UNITED STATES"
Results 341 - 360
of 827
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Apr 2011, 10:00 pm
See paras 23 – 29 of R (English UK Ltd) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2010] EWHC 1726 for a further explanation of the workings of PBS. [read post]
16 May 2014, 2:16 pm
With the Alice Corporation v CLS Bank Supreme Court decision looming in the horizon, and the patentability of software in the US faces its most recent judicial challenge, this writer thought it was best to look at the origins of the current stance of such patents in the United States. [read post]
28 Jul 2010, 6:38 am
United States v. [read post]
17 Apr 2012, 6:02 am
This is a case decided by the United States Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals in 2007. [read post]
25 Mar 2009, 7:27 pm
Parker, Terry E. [read post]
23 Oct 2020, 1:21 pm
United States. 2:05 – 3:05. [read post]
23 Oct 2020, 1:21 pm
United States. 2:05 – 3:05. [read post]
11 Nov 2010, 4:19 pm
(Eugene Volokh) So held the Tenth Circuit on Tuesday in Sampson v. [read post]
25 Jul 2014, 10:15 am
§ 933; see also Parker v. [read post]
28 Nov 2017, 4:16 am
United States, the latest opportunity to revisit the Third-Party Doctrine that served as a facile diversion when created, and has undermined any potential for digital privacy in the future. [read post]
28 Feb 2012, 7:49 am
The United States Fifth Circuit issued an opinion in a case in 1999, where the parties were arguing over the correct interpretation of a portion of an insurance policy. [read post]
20 Feb 2019, 2:44 pm
Kelo v. [read post]
1 Jul 2007, 11:06 pm
JA 201. 07a0244p.06 2007/06/26 Parker v. [read post]
12 Aug 2011, 2:55 pm
Each begins with the sensible assumption that the law as stated in Wickard v. [read post]
6 Apr 2021, 3:20 pm
Nev. 2006); accord Parker v. [read post]
27 Dec 2018, 2:00 pm
Moreover, DOJ components should clearly state that noncompliance with these “voluntary standards will not, in itself, result in any enforcement action. [read post]
31 Mar 2020, 8:38 am
Liles Parker has published a series of articles highlighting the waivers and other actions taken by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services and other Federal and State agencies to ease the burden on healthcare providers during the COVID-19 public health emergency.[2] This article is the first in a two-part series that will highlight some of the more significant provisions of the Cares Act. [read post]
3 Mar 2020, 11:07 am
With the passage of the “False Claims Amendments of 1986,” [5] the Attorney General of the United States was given the authority to issue Civil Investigative Demands in connection with the investigation of civil False Claims Act matters. [read post]
11 Jul 2012, 5:52 am
Taking the United States as ” the paradigm of a mature federal union”, the judge continued, it would be surprising if constitutional or federal law in the United States could legitimately require one state of the Union, before, for example, extraditing a citizen to another State of the Union, to satisfy itself that the sister State would not treat the citizen inconsistently with his or her rights under the Constitution.… [read post]
3 Jul 2014, 7:41 am
The answer, at least on the outset, is not an obvious one, but was faced by the United Kingdom Court of Appeals over a decade ago.The case in question is 1-800 Flowers Inc v Phonenames Ltd, decided in the very first year of the second millennium, which dealt with the phone number "800-FLOWERS", registered in the US as a trademark in the mid 1980s by the company 800-Flowers Inc. [read post]
