Search for: "PARKER v. UNITED STATES"
Results 361 - 380
of 831
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Apr 2021, 3:20 pm
Nev. 2006); accord Parker v. [read post]
27 Dec 2018, 2:00 pm
Moreover, DOJ components should clearly state that noncompliance with these “voluntary standards will not, in itself, result in any enforcement action. [read post]
31 Mar 2020, 8:38 am
Liles Parker has published a series of articles highlighting the waivers and other actions taken by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services and other Federal and State agencies to ease the burden on healthcare providers during the COVID-19 public health emergency.[2] This article is the first in a two-part series that will highlight some of the more significant provisions of the Cares Act. [read post]
11 Jul 2012, 5:52 am
Taking the United States as ” the paradigm of a mature federal union”, the judge continued, it would be surprising if constitutional or federal law in the United States could legitimately require one state of the Union, before, for example, extraditing a citizen to another State of the Union, to satisfy itself that the sister State would not treat the citizen inconsistently with his or her rights under the Constitution.… [read post]
3 Mar 2020, 11:07 am
With the passage of the “False Claims Amendments of 1986,” [5] the Attorney General of the United States was given the authority to issue Civil Investigative Demands in connection with the investigation of civil False Claims Act matters. [read post]
3 Jul 2014, 7:41 am
The answer, at least on the outset, is not an obvious one, but was faced by the United Kingdom Court of Appeals over a decade ago.The case in question is 1-800 Flowers Inc v Phonenames Ltd, decided in the very first year of the second millennium, which dealt with the phone number "800-FLOWERS", registered in the US as a trademark in the mid 1980s by the company 800-Flowers Inc. [read post]
13 Jul 2018, 7:00 am
United States (argued and briefed as Dalmazzi v. [read post]
1 Mar 2011, 1:34 pm
Caldwell (relisted after 2/25 Conference) Docket: 10-622 Issue(s): (1) Whether a binding agreement among multiple states and private companies is immunized from antitrust scrutiny under the state-action immunity doctrine of Parker v. [read post]
22 Nov 2007, 2:28 am
I haven't read the complete record of trial in United States v. [read post]
2 Jul 2008, 12:57 pm
Hsue, Lessons from United States v. [read post]
23 May 2012, 6:13 am
Gutierrez and Holder v. [read post]
26 Apr 2010, 1:30 pm
Parker v. [read post]
19 Jun 2012, 5:13 pm
United States, 405 U.S. 150 (1972) and Brady v. [read post]
18 Apr 2019, 3:44 am
” Leah Litman has this blog’s analysis of yesterday’s oral argument in United States v. [read post]
26 Apr 2010, 11:25 am
Louis Dispatch, and the Columbia (MO) Daily Tribune all report on a case that has been dropped as a result of last week’s ruling in United States v. [read post]
9 Sep 2012, 10:54 am
The United States Court of Appeals for the 5th Circuit issued an opinion in August that illustrates the need for doing this. [read post]
11 Jul 2018, 8:05 am
” Julie Rovner of Governing reports that many states are poised to ban abortion, if Roe v. [read post]
9 Dec 2013, 6:22 am
United States, 265 F.3d 1371, 1375 (Fed. [read post]
19 Feb 2019, 8:51 am
V. [read post]
