Search for: "PARKER v. UNITED STATES" Results 401 - 420 of 829
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Oct 2017, 12:47 pm by Amy Howe
Parker, assistant to the U.S. solicitor general Parker seemed to agree, but added that there was more to consider here: The house was in a state of “disarray. [read post]
8 May 2023, 12:28 am by Christin Thompson
States also have the administrative authority to bar providers from participating in their State Medical Assistance Programs (primarily Medicaid and CHIP).[5] Medicaid exclusion actions[6] are similar to OIG exclusions in many respects, but there are also important differences. [read post]
15 Mar 2011, 7:51 am by Stefanie Levine
Patent No. 5,643,446 entitled FUEL FILTER AND PRIMING PUMP and owned by Parker-Hannifan. [read post]
15 Mar 2011, 7:51 am by Stefanie Levine
Patent No. 5,643,446 entitled FUEL FILTER AND PRIMING PUMP and owned by Parker-Hannifan. [read post]
9 Apr 2014, 11:26 am by By Rose Saxe, AIDS Project
Since the Supreme Court ruled that the federal government could no longer refuse to recognize marriages of same-sex couples in United States v. [read post]
4 Jun 2018, 5:29 pm by Richard A. Epstein
He thus notes that this incident occurred in 2012, before same-sex marriage was legal in Colorado or protected under the equal protection clause to the United States Constitution. [read post]
3 Jul 2018, 9:00 am by Robert Liles
  The UPICs Perform numerous functions to detect, prevent, and deter specific risks and broader vulnerabilities to the integrity of the Medicare and Medicaid programs including, but not limited to:Proactively identify incidents of potential fraud, waste, and abuse that exist within its service area and take appropriate action on each case;Investigate allegations of fraud made by beneficiaries, providers/suppliers, CMS, Health & Human Services Office of Inspector General (OIG), and other… [read post]
19 Jun 2018, 7:43 am by Jason J. Kim and Christopher J. Dufek
On June 11, 2018, the United States Supreme Court ruled that American Pipe tolling does not extend to follow-on class actions brought after the statute of limitations period has run. [read post]
12 Sep 2016, 1:21 pm by Sasha Volokh
And while such bodies may benefit from the immunity recognized in Parker v. [read post]
20 Apr 2010, 10:12 am by Jim Lindgren
United States, 283 F.2d 430 (9th Cir.1960) (threat of damage to property was made merely by mentioning troubles that other contractors had had); People v. [read post]