Search for: "PARKER v. UNITED STATES"
Results 461 - 480
of 827
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Oct 2017, 3:31 am
In 2014, a United States District Court in New Mexico sided with the Wiccans and the American Civil Liberties Union, which represented them. [read post]
8 Jul 2009, 4:37 am
See Parker v. [read post]
28 Sep 2020, 8:58 am
NEW — Debt referred to the United States Department of Treasury. 42 C.F.R. [read post]
28 Sep 2020, 8:58 am
NEW — Debt referred to the United States Department of Treasury. 42 C.F.R. [read post]
1 Aug 2011, 4:39 am
In Sable v. [read post]
4 Sep 2012, 10:00 am
Parker, 707 A.2d 77, 78 (Me. 1998). [read post]
7 Aug 2012, 3:32 am
Shortly after its passage, the Supreme Court held that the Amendment “is not a mere prohibition of State laws establishing or upholding slavery, but an absolute declaration that slavery or involuntary servitude shall not exist in any part of the United States. [read post]
20 Apr 2016, 3:04 am
More coverage of Monday’s oral argument in United States v. [read post]
20 Feb 2019, 2:45 pm
In United States v. [read post]
29 Dec 2010, 4:00 am
State, 690 So. 2d 1132 (Miss. 1997). [read post]
16 Jul 2015, 5:00 pm
No surprise after United States v. [read post]
8 Feb 2017, 3:26 pm
State v. [read post]
16 Aug 2006, 8:27 am
Hovenkamp offers a nice discussion of the interaction between regulation and antitrust and of the variety of ways in which antitrust steps back, including federal regulatory immunity; state action immunity under Parker v. [read post]
8 Mar 2019, 9:27 pm
In Danielle Seaman v. [read post]
14 Feb 2011, 8:58 am
The defense is that (1) the MSA is not a compact requiring congressional approval under the leading modern case, Parker v. [read post]
11 Jan 2019, 2:32 pm
In Parker Drilling Management Services v. [read post]
17 Mar 2021, 12:44 pm
United States that the evacuation order was legal. [read post]
1 Sep 2017, 1:38 pm
Benson and Parker v. [read post]
1 Sep 2017, 1:38 pm
Benson and Parker v. [read post]
9 Apr 2012, 7:07 am
Accordingly, DAI has failed to satisfy its burden of establishing the elements of its purported associational standing.Now, the United States did intervene in this case. [read post]
