Search for: "PARKER v. UNITED STATES"
Results 521 - 540
of 766
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Mar 2011, 7:44 am
CaldwellDocket: 10-622Issue(s): (1) Whether a binding agreement among multiple states and private companies is immunized from antitrust scrutiny under the state-action immunity doctrine of Parker v. [read post]
4 Mar 2011, 9:11 am
United StatesDocket: 10-516Issue(s): Whether an essential element to be proven for a conviction for the offense of bribery of a state or local official under 18 U.S.C. [read post]
1 Mar 2011, 1:34 pm
Caldwell (relisted after 2/25 Conference) Docket: 10-622 Issue(s): (1) Whether a binding agreement among multiple states and private companies is immunized from antitrust scrutiny under the state-action immunity doctrine of Parker v. [read post]
26 Feb 2011, 8:23 am
(internal quotation marks omitted)); Parker v. [read post]
25 Feb 2011, 1:26 pm
CaldwellDocket: 10-622Issue(s): (1) Whether a binding agreement among multiple states and private companies is immunized from antitrust scrutiny under the state-action immunity doctrine of Parker v. [read post]
21 Feb 2011, 7:23 am
The abuse of eminent domain in the United States is at least as old as the U.S. [read post]
18 Feb 2011, 3:44 am
In this case, the Second Circuit upholds the preclusion of evidence (an illegal gun) because the search violated the Fourth Amendment.The case is United States v. [read post]
14 Feb 2011, 8:58 am
The defense is that (1) the MSA is not a compact requiring congressional approval under the leading modern case, Parker v. [read post]
29 Jan 2011, 4:19 pm
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. [read post]
29 Jan 2011, 7:47 am
United States v. [read post]
24 Jan 2011, 9:56 pm
I highly favour the role of an “IP coordinator,” and I am pleased that the United States went in this direction. [read post]
9 Jan 2011, 7:31 am
United Emergency Animal Clinic, Inc., 390 F.3d 1124, 1127 (9th Cir.2004) (considering the applicability of § 541.304 to veterinarians); Parker v. [read post]
6 Jan 2011, 4:12 am
United States v. [read post]
29 Dec 2010, 9:34 am
V. [read post]
29 Dec 2010, 4:00 am
State, 690 So. 2d 1132 (Miss. 1997). [read post]
24 Dec 2010, 2:58 am
United States v. [read post]
23 Dec 2010, 2:42 pm
She sounds like a super-perky high school president, not a United States Senator. [read post]
19 Dec 2010, 5:51 am
December 14, 2010) (Jacobs, Pooler, Parker, CJJ)In United States v. [read post]
7 Dec 2010, 2:20 am
United States v. [read post]
28 Nov 2010, 3:59 pm
Citizens United was the example. [read post]
